Business News

CNBC Business Dec 9, 21:02

Eli Lilly to build $6 billion manufacturing plant in Alabama to help make upcoming obesity pill, other drugs

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuEli Lilly on Tuesday said it will spend $6 billion to build a manufacturing plant in Huntsville, Alabama, to help boost production of its closely watched experimental obesity pill and other drugs. It is the third facility in a string of new planned U.S. investments by the drugmaker. Eli Lilly announced in February that it would spend at least $27 billion to build four new domestic manufacturing plants, adding to $23 billion in previous investments since 2020.The company said it expects construction of the Alabama plant to start in 2026 and for it to be completed in 2032. "Today's investment continues the onshoring of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) production, strengthening supply chain resilience and reliable access to medicines for patients in the U.S.," said Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks in a release. That added production capacity for Eli Lilly's obesity pill, orforglipron, is crucial as the company races to file for its approval and tries to maintain its dominance in the booming market for GLP-1s. The company and its chief rival, Novo Nordisk, faced supply shortages for their existing weekly injections after demand skyrocketed in the U.S. in recent years, though they have managed to alleviate those issues.Eli Lily's pill in November won a priority review voucher from the Food and Drug Administration, which will significantly speed up the regulator's assessment of the drug to potentially a few months. Drugmakers have been scrambling to boost their production in the U.S. after threats by President Donald Trump to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals imported into the U.S. But concerns about those potential tariffs have eased following recent drug pricing deals with Trump that exempt companies from the levies.Eli Lilly said the Alabama site will bring 450 jobs to the area, including engineers, scientists, operations personnel and lab technicians, as well as 3,000 construction jobs. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

CNBC Business Dec 9, 19:43

Fifth Third signs deal making fintech firm Brex the provider of its commercial cards

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuRegional bank Fifth Third on Tuesday announced a deal making fintech firm Brex the provider of its commercial cards and expense management tools for business clients. The program will run on Brex's embedded payments platform, which lets banks issue corporate cards and automate expense reporting using artificial intelligence tools, the companies said in a release.The move shows how some banks are choosing to partner with fintech firms rather than building their own platforms to keep up with clients' evolving technology expectations. Fifth Third is in the process of acquiring Comerica, a deal expected to make it the ninth-largest U.S. bank with about $288 billion in assets."Our partnership with Brex is a commitment to redefine how companies leverage financial technology," Fifth Third CEO Tim Spence said in a statement. "By combining the strength of a leading bank with Brex's AI-driven innovation, we're creating intelligent solutions that simplify complexity, drive efficiency and enable businesses to scale globally with confidence."Financial terms of the deal weren't disclosed.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 9, 19:05

Take a look inside Target's new fashion-focused store in New York's SoHo neighborhood

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuIn one of New York City's most fashion-forward neighborhoods, Target is unveiling its latest effort to keep up with trends and lead the way on style. The Minneapolis-based retailer, which is in the middle of a turnaround effort and on the cusp of a CEO change, gave a makeover to its big-box store in SoHo at 600 Broadway.The one-of-a-kind concept store, which opens Tuesday, will have rotating merchandise, curated displays chosen by celebrities and influencers, and other kinds of special programming, Chief Guest Experience Officer Cara Sylvester said.The SoHo store is part of a broader push by incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke to win back Target's reputation for style and sharp merchandise. When he was named Target's next leader in August, he said that would be one of his top three priorities, along with improving the customer experience and rolling out technology to make Target faster and more efficient. He will start the role in February, succeeding longtime CEO Brian Cornell.Target is trying to get back to growth after roughly four years of stagnant annual sales due to self-inflicted challenges and a more difficult economic backdrop. Store foot traffic and sales have fallen as shoppers have responded to sloppier stores, out-of-stock and locked-up items, and the company's decision to roll back key diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Consumers across the country have also become more selective about buying discretionary merchandise, which has long been Target's sweet spot, as they pay more for necessities like groceries, electricity and housing.At an event previewing the store on Monday night, Fiddelke described the SoHo location as "a punctuation point" for Target's sense of style and its plans for the future. In an interview with CNBC, Sylvester said the store's merchandise has completely changed. The location, which opened about seven years ago, drew many shoppers and had strong sales, but sold mostly items found in drug and convenience stores, she said. It didn't carry any of Target's clothing or home decor, which felt both out of step with the neighborhood and like a missed opportunity for Target, she said."We said, 'This is the style and fashion capital. We have to be able to showcase the best,'" she said, recalling the inspiration for the project.From start to finish, the store's redesign took four months as the company raced to get the project done ahead of the holidays, Sylvester said. It has redone the store's first floor and plans to redesign the basement floor in the coming year, she added.The SoHo store is reopening at a time when holiday shoppers and tourists flock to the major shopping district for holiday gifts and party outfits — and as Target chases sales across the country during the critical shopping season. It is one of 42 stores that the retailer has in New York City and nearly 2,000 that is has in the U.S."The world looks at New York to see what's new and what's next," Sylvester said in remarks at the launch event. "And we want them to look at Target when they see what's new and what's next."When customers step inside of Target's SoHo store, they will enter a long, red hallway that resembles the inside of Target's Bullseye logo. The area of the store is called "The Drop," and Target will display merchandise there chosen around themes that feel relevant for the time of year, Sylvester said. Like most of the store, the rotating area will swap out about every four to six weeks, she added.As the store opens, The Drop is themed around the holidays — including outfits and items that a shopper may need for going out, lounging at home or giving a gift to a party host. The store displays range across categories, mixing in clothing, home decor, beauty items and more. For example, The Drop currently includes a table of products that a shopper might want if they're hosting a night at home with friends, such as card games, an espresso martini mix and eye-catching glassware for the cocktails.Sylvester said the company's merchants are already working on the next two themes for The Drop, which will be focused on wellness in January, the season of New Year's resolutions, and Valentine's Day in February.Customers can step inside of Target's "Broadway Beauty Bar," which is designed for selfies and social media posts. It will have a rotating assortment of Target's beauty merchandise, including fragrance brands like Fine'ry that are exclusive to Target, and trendy mini versions of face washes, lip glosses and more from national brands.At launch, Target is featuring items chosen by celebrity makeup artist Katie Jane Hughes. Along with the "Beauty Bar," the store sells items typically found at the big-box retailer, including large shampoos, body washes and cotton balls.Near the beauty area, shoppers can also press a button and snap a black-and-white selfie.Though the store's layout is new, it shares a similarity with some of Target's other New York City locations — some items are locked behind glasses cases that an employee needs to open.In the back of the store's first floor, Target will have a rotating "Curated By" display of items from across the retailer's beauty, fashion and home categories, picked by celebrities and other creators known for their sense of style. Shoppers can browse and buy that person's favorites or scan a QR code to see a list of them.Target's first Curated By features favorites from Megan Stalter, an actress and comedian who is in HBO's "Hacks." Some of her picks include a throw pillow, a pair of hot pink slippers, metallic water bottles and Universal's "Wicked: For Good" movie-themed clothing items.Also at the store, shoppers can find Target's "Gifting Gondola," which features merchandise exclusive to Target. Currently, the display includes holiday-themed plush penguins, bears and other products from Target's toy brand, Gigglescape. It also includes some giftable items themed around the retailer's bull terrier, Bullseye, including special edition Haribo gummy candies and a Bullseye Pez dispenser.Over time, Sylvester said Target may introduce some items that are unique to the SoHo store and can only be bought there. Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 9, 15:42

Commercial real estate deal volume drops for the first time in nearly two years

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuA version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Property Play newsletter with Diana Olick. Property Play covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.The recovery in commercial real estate has been slow and bumpy, much like interest rate policy over the past few years. The two, of course, are deeply connected. After gaining significant momentum coming out of the pandemic, this year has been rough. October was the first month of negative year-over-year transaction volume growth since the post-Fed rate hike recovery began in early 2024, according to monthly data provided by Moody's as a media exclusive to CNBC's Property Play. It tracks the top 50 commercial real estate, or CRE, property sales across the U.S.Deal volume growth turned positive in the early part of last year and was even approaching pre-Covid levels by year-end. "More than an imminent downturn in the CRE capital markets, the slip to negative growth in October 2025 reflects the stalemate going on between buyers and sellers," said Kevin Fagan, head of CRE capital market research at Moody's. "The bottom of the U-shaped recovery from 2023 low volumes has been lengthened by persistently high interest rates and policy and economic uncertainty of 2025." But October was still an active month. There were $24.4 billion of sales, which is roughly 70% of October 2019 sales. Total dollar volume is still higher this year than it was last year, but the momentum of growth has slowed significantly since 2023.Looking at specific property trends, industrial and multifamily led the top 50 deals. The only sector to improve in deal volume compared with last year was hotel. It saw 6% growth after a negative third quarter.One notable sale: The New York Edition hotel at 5 Madison Avenue was sold for $231.2 million by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, a sovereign wealth fund, to the Kam Sang Company, a real estate development firm. "The New York Edition hotel is an interesting one because of both the sales price being so high, a Mideast sovereign wealth fund pulling out of NYC, and the history of the building," said Fagan, noting that it was originally an office building called the MetLife Clock Tower and was the tallest building in the world for roughly three years from 1910 to 1913. Both the Clock Tower and the Woolworth building, which was also once the tallest in the world, were converted to hotel and residential, respectively, starting around 2013. "They are nearly worthless as offices, but extremely valuable as a hotel and an apartment building, respectively," Fagan added.Meanwhile the multifamily segment saw the biggest pullback in October, down 27% from 2024. It had been showing volumes that were higher than pre-Covid levels in the four months before, and, despite the pullback, buildings were mostly trading at a premium to previous sales.CNBC's Property Play with Diana Olick covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, delivered weekly to your inbox.Subscribe here to get access today.Office continued its rocky recovery, with either discounts or property conversions as part of the story. The top October sale was of the Sotheby's headquarters to Weill Cornell, which probably means a repurposing to health care or medical office, according to Fagan.New York Life picked up a distressed Manhattan office building from BGO for almost half of its last sale price in 2015. "It shows there is institutional interest in offices sold at discounts, reinforcing the long-term value floor for office buildings in good markets, and the recognized enduring utility of such properties," Fagan said.The niche real estate sector that’s luring big money for small kids' careDiana OlickApartment rents drop further, with vacancies at record highDiana OlickThe warehouse real estate sector is seeing a rebalance. Here's what to watch forDiana OlickRead MoreSubscribe to CNBC PROSubscribe to Investing ClubLicensing & ReprintsCNBC CouncilsJoin the CNBC PanelDigital ProductsNews ReleasesClosed CaptioningCorrectionsAbout CNBCInternshipsSite MapCareersHelpContactNews TipsGot a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 22:25

Paramount Skydance launches hostile bid for WBD 'to finish what we started,' CEO Ellison tells CNBC

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuParamount Skydance is launching a hostile bid to buy Warner Bros. Discovery after it lost out to Netflix in a monthslong bidding war for the legacy assets, the company said Monday. Paramount will go straight to WBD shareholders with an all-cash, $30 per share offer. That's the same bid WBD rejected last week and equates to an enterprise value of $108.4 billion. The offer is backstopped with equity financing from the Ellison family and the private equity firm RedBird Capital as well as $54 billion in debt commitments from Bank of America, Citi and Apollo Global Management, Paramount said in a news release. A portion of the equity financing comes from outside Middle Eastern financing partners including Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, Abu Dhabi's L'imad Holding Company PJSC, and the Qatar Investment Authority. Another portion derives from Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners. Kushner is U.S. President Donald Trump's son-in-law. Those partners have agreed to "forgo any governance rights," including board seats, as part of their non-voting equity investment, according to a Paramount filing. The modifications allow the deal to be outside of the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS. Shares of Paramount gained 9% Monday. Warner Bros. Discovery's shares rose about 4% while Netflix was down 3%."We're really here to finish what we started," Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" on Monday. "We put the company in play." Paramount Skydance began its hunt for Warner Bros. Discovery in September, submitting three bids before WBD launched a formal sale process that ultimately brought in other suitors. On Friday, Netflix announced a deal to acquire WBD's studio and streaming assets for a combination of cash and stock, valued at $27.75 per WBD share, or $72 billion. Paramount had been bidding for the entirety of Warner Bros. Discovery, including those assets and the company's TV networks like CNN and TNT Sports. "We're sitting on Wall Street, where cash is still king. We are offering shareholders $17.6 billion more cash than the deal they currently have signed up with Netflix, and we believe when they see what it is currently in our offer that that's what they'll vote for," Ellison said. Ellison said Monday he places a value of $1 per share on the linear cable assets, which are set to trade as a separate public entity called Discovery Global in mid-2026. WBD executives have privately valued the assets closer to $3 per share. Paramount has repeatedly argued to the WBD board of directors that keeping Warner Bros. Discovery whole is in the best interest of its shareholders. Paramount made a bid on Dec. 1 and heard back from WBD that it needed to make certain alterations to the offer, Ellison said Monday. When Paramount made the changes and upped its bid to $30 per share, Ellison never heard back from WBD CEO David Zaslav, he said.Ellison said he told Zaslav via text message that $30 per share wasn't the company's best and final offer, suggesting the company is willing to bid higher still.Ellison argued Paramount's deal will have a shorter regulatory approval process given the company's smaller size and friendly relationship with the Trump administration. He called Trump a believer "in competition" and said Paramount's combination with WBD will be "a real competitor to Netflix, a real competitor to Amazon."Ellison also threw cold water on Netflix's chances of regulatory approval."Allowing the No. 1 streaming service to combine with the No. 3 streaming service is anticompetitive," Ellison said.CNBC reported Friday that the Trump administration was viewing the deal with "heavy skepticism," and Trump said Sunday that the market share considerations could pose a "problem." Netflix agreed to pay Warner Bros. Discovery $5.8 billion if the deal is not approved, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing Friday. Warner Bros. Discovery said it would pay a $2.8 billion breakup fee if it decides to call off the deal to pursue a different merger.Netflix, for its part, once again championed the deal as positive for shareholders, consumers and the media industry as a whole when its top leadership spoke at the UBS Global Media and Communications Conference on Monday. Co-CEO Greg Peters said they recognize the Netflix deal came as a shock but called the Warner Bros. studio and HBO Max content complementary to Netflix's business.Co-CEO Ted Sarandos said the acquisition would protect jobs at a time when layoffs have been rampant across media: "In the offer that Paramount was talking about today, they also were talking about $6 billion of synergies. Where do you think synergies come from? Cutting jobs. So we're not cutting jobs, we're making jobs." — CNBC's Lillian Rizzo contributed to this report. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 22:23

Stellantis to bring tiny Fiat car to U.S. following Trump remarks

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuDETROIT – Chrysler parent Stellantis on Monday announced it will offer an all-electric small "car" called the Fiat Topolino in the U.S.The automaker did not announce timing for the vehicle, but Fiat CEO Olivier François confirmed plans to bring the vehicle to the market, with "more details to come next year."Fiat's announcement comes less than a week after President Donald Trump praised small "Kei" cars from Japan during a meeting at the White House with Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa and other U.S. lawmakers and automotive executives."They're very small. They're really cute," Trump said during the Wednesday meeting. "And I said, 'How would that do in this country?' And everyone seems to think 'good,' but you're not allowed to build them."Trump said he ordered U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to allow small vehicles like the Kei "micro" cars to be built and driven in the U.S. It's not necessarily illegal to produce such cars in America, but they have to meet American safety standards, speed requirements and other regulations.A Stellantis spokeswoman said Fiat's announcement was unrelated to Trump's comments last week and that the automaker has been gauging customer interest for the Topolino at U.S. events such as auto shows.The Topolino, which translates to "little mouse" in Italian, is actually categorized as "an all-electric quadricycle" rather than a car, according to Stellantis. It has a top speed of roughly 28 miles per hour and driving range of up to 75 kilometers (less than 50 miles) on a single charge. The vehicle is produced in Morocco.Small cars have historically not sold well in the U.S.The most recent meaningful push to sell small cars in the U.S. occurred after the Great Recession in 2009 under the Obama administration. Back then, Italian automaker Fiat was allowed to purchase bankrupt automaker Chrysler, in part, to help bring such vehicles to the U.S.Fiat and its small 500 city car reentered the U.S. market in 2011 amid Fiat's takeover of Chrysler (both now owned by Stellantis). In its first full year in 2012, Fiat sold 43,772 vehicles in the U.S. Those sales have since dwindled to roughly 1,500 Fiat vehicles sold last year in the U.S.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 22:01

Here's what to expect in Paramount's quest to elbow out Netflix and buy Warner Bros. Discovery

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuParamount Skydance laid out its plan Monday to persuade Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders that it's a better buyer for the company than Netflix. The hostile bid kicks off a tug-of-war that could get complicated. Paramount has officially launched a tender offer for current WBD shares at $30 per share, all cash. That bid is backed by $41 billion in equity financing. The remainder will be money from RedBird Capital and Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners. Paramount also has $54 billion in debt commitments from Bank of America, Citi and Apollo Global Management.Paramount's tender offer will be open for 20 business days, Paramount Chief Strategy Officer Andy Gordon said during a conference call for investors Monday. Warner Bros. Discovery has 10 days to respond, and after the 20 business days are up, Paramount has the option to extend the deadline to keep the offer open for WBD shareholders, Gordon said.During this time, any shareholder of WBD can sell its shares to Paramount for $30. If Paramount buys 51% of outstanding shares, it would control the company. "We do believe the [Paramount] offer should garner meaningful traction," Raymond James equity analyst Ric Prentiss wrote in a note to clients. "That said, we believe that Netflix is committed to this deal; if [Paramount] seems to be gaining traction, we would not be surprised to see a reaction."That reaction could come in the form of an increased Netflix offer, though Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos didn't mention as much when speaking Monday at the UBS Global Media and Communications Conference. A prolonged battle could eventually invite lawsuits or proxy fights that would demand full shareholder votes. The WBD board said in a statement Monday it "is not modifying its recommendation with respect to the agreement with Netflix." It advised shareholders "not to take any action at this time with respect to Paramount Skydance's proposal."Still, the board will "carefully review and consider Paramount Skydance's offer in accordance with the terms of Warner Bros. Discovery's agreement with Netflix, Inc.," the board said in its statement. If WBD shareholders seem to be convinced that Paramount's is the superior bid, Warner Bros. Discovery management could restart friendly discussions with Paramount to make sure it's getting the best deal possible. Paramount CEO David Ellison told CNBC's David Faber on Monday that the company's $30-per-share offer was not its "best and final," suggesting Paramount is open to paying more for WBD if discussions begin again.Ellison hopes to convince WBD shareholders that a $30-per-share, all-cash offer is more valuable than Netflix's $27.75-per-share, cash-and-stock offer for WBD's streaming and studio assets. Ellison told CNBC on Monday that he values the linear cable networks, which aren't part of Netflix's bid, at just $1 per share. WBD internally has valued that business at about $3 per share, CNBC previously reported.If WBD reaches a deal with Paramount, WBD would owe Netflix $2.8 billion as a breakup fee — meaning Paramount may have to increase its bid, or agree to pay the fee, to adjust for the added cost. Ellison said Monday that Paramount's odds for regulatory approval, combined with what he views as a higher bid, should sway shareholders that the WBD board made a mistake in choosing Netflix's offer. A Netflix-HBO max combination would create a streamer "at such a scale that it would be bad for Hollywood and bad for the consumer," said Ellison, noting it would be "anticompetitive in every way you fundamentally look at it.""We're super confident we're going to get it across the line and finish," Sarandos said Monday at the UBS conference. Sarandos also jabbed Paramount's estimate of $6 billion in synergies, noting those potential cost cuts would likely mean job losses."We're not cutting jobs, we're making jobs," Sarandos said.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 18:26

Comcast president outlines unsuccessful WBD offer and future of NBC's Peacock

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuComcast's top brass on Monday pulled the curtain back on the company's unsuccessful bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, detailing an offer far different from its rival bidders. Mike Cavanagh, Comcast president and soon-to-be co-CEO, walked through the specifics of the proposal —and the company's thinking — during the UBS Global Media and Communications Conference on Monday, just days after Comcast was knocked out of the bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery assets. "When we looked at the circumstances of how it all came to be ... we didn't expect that we had a high likelihood of prevailing with a deal that made sense to us. We debated whether to bother or not. Do we want the disruption? Do we want the distraction?" said Cavanagh. "But it's our job, so we thought better to take a look and do the work and see where it leads. You never know. And so that's what we did." Comcast, like Netflix, bid solely on the Warner Bros. film studio and HBO Max streaming business. Paramount Skydance's offer was for the entirety of the business, including the cable TV portfolio comprised of networks like CNN and TNT. "We are not interested in stressing the Comcast balance sheet," Cavanagh said Monday. "As a result, that meant our proposal was light, relative to other proposals from what I gather, on cash." Last week Netflix was named the winning bidder. On Monday Paramount launched a hostile offer. Comcast offered "a significant chunk of equity in a combined entertainment company," which would have put NBCUniversal — including its Universal theme parks and film studio as well as its broadcast network and streaming platform Peacock — together with Warner Bros.' studio and HBO Max, Cavanagh said. The resulting combination would have been a publicly traded, controlled subsidiary of Comcast. That vehicle would provide shareholders with returns, but would not constitute a full spinout, which would have involved a complete separation of the companies. Comcast's NBCUniversal is in the midst of a spinout of its portfolio of cable TV networks, which includes CNBC. In contrast, Netflix's proposed transaction is comprised of cash and stock, valued at $27.75 per WBD share. The equity value of the transaction is $72 billion, with a total enterprise value of about $82.7 billion.Paramount went straight to WBD shareholders on Monday with an all-cash, $30 per share tender offer, which equates to an enterprise value of $108.4 billion. "We respect and understand the decision of the Warner Brothers board to obviously prefer the certainty of high levels of cash or collared stock," said Cavanagh.Comcast leadership has long said the company's bar for doing mergers and acquisitions is high. "Good news is that we like what we are doing ... and we roll on with a lot of focus, but I think we're better for having taken a look," Cavanagh said. Comcast's NBCUniversal has been shape-shifting in recent years — from the spinout of its cable TV networks, to a heavy focus on bulking up on sports rights like the NBA, to building out its theme parks presence. The company has also been building out Peacock. NBCUniversal launched its streaming play in 2020 and it has slowly built up since then. As of Sept. 30 Peacock had 41 million subscribers, paling in comparison to HBO Max's 128 million customers as of Sept. 30 and Netflix's more than 300 million customers as of late 2024.Cavanagh said Monday that had Comcast's offer for Warner Bros. Discovery been successful, "it would have been an interesting play.""It probably would have changed our streaming aspirations to be global streaming aspirations by necessity," he added.Sports have been key to the playbook in fueling Peacock's subscriber growth. NBCUniversal has nabbed exclusive NFL games to Peacock in addition to simulcasting its "Sunday Night Football" package from NBC's broadcast network. It paid heavily to bring back the NBA to NBC, with exclusive games for Peacock, too. The Olympics have also be integral in its growth. Live events such as the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade have helped boost viewership across TV and streaming, too. Peacock has also been increasing its subscription price, similar to its peers. In July Peacock raised prices again, just months ahead of the beginning of the NBA season. Unlike most of its competitors, Peacock has yet to report a profit, however. For the quarter ended Sept. 30, Peacock reported losses of $217 million, an improvement from $436 million in losses during the same period last year. Cavanagh noted Monday that Peacock improved in the trailing 12 months by $900 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Peacock's losses are expected to "meaningfully improve" next year compared with 2025, with "a trajectory to a positive future." Disclosure: CNBC parent NBCUniversal owns NBC Sports and NBC Olympics. NBC Olympics is the U.S. broadcast rights holder to all Summer and Winter Games through 2036. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 17:14

McDonald’s will assess if franchisees are offering value for customers under new standards

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuMcDonald's will soon assess its franchisees on how their prices deliver value as the company updates its franchising standards as part of a larger bid to win over cash-strapped diners."Effective January 1, 2026, we are enhancing our global franchising standards across all Segments to reinforce accountability for value leadership," Andrew Gregory, McDonald's senior vice president of global franchising, development and delivery, wrote in a memo issued Monday and obtained by CNBC. "With enhanced standards, we aim to provide greater clarity to the System to ensure every restaurant delivers consistent, reliable value across the full customer experience."Franchising standards are the policies that define how McDonald's operators should run their restaurants. Continued noncompliance with those standards could result in penalties, like not being permitted to open another restaurant, or even the termination of the franchise. Franchisees run about 95% of McDonald's restaurants worldwide and set their restaurants' prices, with input from third-party pricing advisors. Under the new standard, the company will "holistically assess" pricing decisions for how well they offer value, Gregory wrote in the memo."This approach enables franchisees to bring local insight to how value is delivered in their restaurants," he said.The change comes after McDonald's U.S. President Joe Erlinger told owners last month that they needed to keep their foot on the gas and stay the course on promoting the chain's value offerings.Across the restaurant industry, eateries have been leaning into value, betting that deals will attract cash-strapped customers. But discounts that are too steep can cut into profits, and operators have to strike a delicate balance to preserve both traffic and long-term profitability.For more than a year, McDonald's has reported that low-income consumers have been spending less money and visiting less frequently. To bring diners back to its restaurants, it has rolled out value menus in the U.S. and other key markets like France and Germany. The efforts have so far paid off, as the company has reversed same-store sales declines and attracted more high-income diners who are trading down to fast food.Still, McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski said he expects that the pressure on the consumer isn't going away anytime soon."We continue to remain cautious about the health of the consumer in the U.S. and our top international markets and believe the pressures will continue well into 2026," Kempczinski said on the company's earnings conference call last month. The company's change in standards is likely to rile some McDonald's U.S. franchisees who already have a contentious relationship with their franchisor. An independent advocacy group of McDonald's operators has pushed for the company to contribute financially to make discounts more sustainable for franchisees in the long run. Several years ago, a new grading system for franchisees drew the ire of some operators, who said at the time that it would alienate workers in a tight labor environment.In addition to updating the franchising standards, McDonald's has also invested in tools to help franchisees determine how to address value in their local markets."While Owner/Operators continue to set their own prices and make decisions that reflect local market nuances, we've now strengthened individual accountability for value leadership – equipping you with approved pricing consultants, tools, and other levels that support informed choices and elevate the overall guest experience across all order points," McDonald's USA Chief Restaurant Officer Mason Smoot wrote in a separate memo sent to U.S. franchisees Monday and obtained by CNBC.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 15:13

Rising stocks and IPOs helped create 287 new billionaires this year

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuRising stock markets, a return of merger activity and flowing inheritances helped create 287 new billionaires this year, bringing the global total to over 2,900, according to a new report.Billionaire wealth reached a record $15.8 trillion as of the end of the third quarter, up 13%, according to the UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report 2025. Of the world's 2,919 billionaires, 2,059 are self-made and 860 inherited their wealth, according to the report.This year marked the second-highest total of newly minted billionaires recorded by the UBS survey, behind only 2021, when 360 new billionaires were created. Over the past four years, 727 people have become billionaires, increasing the global total by 27%.While artificial intelligence and tech billionaires may dominate the wealth headlines, the new billionaires of 2025 made their fortunes in a more diverse array of industries – from software and genetics to restaurants, infrastructure and natural gas.The new cohort includes Ben Lamm, co-founder of genetics and bioscience company Colossal; Michael Dorrell, co-founder and CEO of Stonepeak, an infrastructure investment firm; and Bob Pender and Mike Sabel, who co-founded Venture Global, a liquid natural gas exporter that went public in January. The Inside Wealth newsletter by Robert Frank is your weekly guide to high-net-worth investors and the industries that serve them.Subscribe here to get access today. "There is a lot of room for new, self-made entrepreneurs to create wealth," said Judy Spalthoff, head of UBS Family Office Solutions Group.The U.S. led the global billionaire increase, with 92 new self-made billionaires representing wealth of $180 billion, according to UBS. Nearly a third of the world's billionaires, or 924 people, are in the U.S. Their total wealth soared by 18% over the past year to $17.5 trillion. Three quarters of American billionaires are self-made, the report found.The great wealth transfer is also minting new billionaires through inheritance. In the past year, 91 people became billionaires through inheritance, receiving nearly $300 billion in wealth, UBS found. Of the inheritors, 64 were male and 27 female. Over the next 15 years, $5.9 trillion will be inherited by children and spouses from billionaires, mostly in the U.S., the report estimates.Attitudes toward raising the next generation of wealth, however, are changing – especially among family-owned companies. Rather than expecting them to take over the family business, today's billionaires are hiring professional managers or selling their companies, allowing their kids to be more independent and find their own careers."A few decades ago, succession into the family business was the norm, because markets were slower to change and continuity provided stability," one unnamed European billionaire told UBS for the report. "Today, globalization, faster disruption cycles, and greater risk that existing businesses may not endure in their current form have shifted priorities. With professional management more common, families now see more value in children developing resilience, education and adaptability over inheriting a role." When it comes to investing, billionaires remain bullish on stocks, especially in the U.S. Despite signs of an over-heated market and growing concentration among a handful of AI-driven tech stocks, 43% of billionaires plan to add to their public equities in the next 12 months, UBS reports. Only 5% plan to decrease their equities, it found. Private equity is a mixed bag. Half plan to add to their direct investments in the next year, while 37% plan to add to their private equity funds, according to UBS. At the same time, 28% plan to reduce their investments in private equity funds, likely as a result of poor returns and lack of exits. Most plan to keep their cash holdings the same and a third plan to add to their real estate holdings.Billionaires' faith in America as an investment has declined in the past year. The share of those surveyed who see investment opportunities in the U.S. dropped from 80% to 64%. In turn, billionaires are more optimistic about Europe, with the share of respondents saying they see investment opportunity there rising from 18% to 40%. With regard to China, that same share rose from 11% to 34%."When we look at the volatility around the marketplace that we had this year, the policy uncertainty and the high valuations, we're consistently seeing from these billionaire families that they're looking to diversify to more value trades," said Daniel Scansaroli, head of portfolio strategy in the UBS Chief Investment Office. "They still have a strong bias towards American exceptionalism. It's just lost a lot of the shine in the process."Along with moving their money, billionaires are also moving their residences around the world. More than a third (36%) of billionaires have relocated, with a quarter of them relocating more than once, according to UBS. Another 9% said they are considering a relocation.Their chief reason for moving to another country was "to be able to have a better quality of life for me or my family," according to the report. Spalthoff said that could include better weather, better healthcare or closer proximity to children or family. They also cite geopolitical concerns and tax organization.Overall, Spalthoff said she expects the billionaire population and wealth to continue to grow next year."We see wealth continuing to accelerate," she said. "In the U.S., especially, with the rapid growth of tech and industrials, we don't see the growth of billionaire wealth slowing down."What the retail boom in alternative assets means for risk, liquidity and portfolio allocationLeslie PickerWhere billionaires' investment firms placed their bets in NovemberHayley CuccinelloAsset-backed finance is growing fast and drawing new scrutinyRobert FrankRead MoreSubscribe to CNBC PROSubscribe to Investing ClubLicensing & ReprintsCNBC CouncilsJoin the CNBC PanelDigital ProductsNews ReleasesClosed CaptioningCorrectionsAbout CNBCInternshipsSite MapCareersHelpContactNews TipsGot a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 8, 14:00

United maintains elite status requirements for 2027, but here's what's changing

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuUnited Airlines is joining Delta Air Lines in holding steady its requirements to earn elite frequent flyer status next year after it raised the bar in 2025.Airlines have spent years making it more expensive to get high-tier status, which comes with perks like early boarding, free first-class upgrades (when they're available), waived baggage fees or even airport lounge access.But hordes of elite travelers in the wake of the pandemic — when airlines let many customers hold onto their status — have meant more crowded early boarding groups. And a rise in premium credit card-toting customers has led to longer waits at some airport lounges than at TSA checkpoints.Airline executives have also said that more customers are willing to pay cash to sit in first class, making fewer seats available for complimentary upgrades that are a draw for many consumers to chase status.For United, its program is more in balance now, said Luc Bondar, president of United's MileagePlus loyalty program. "When you have benefits like upgrades, if everyone has status, then … fewer and fewer customers are going to get access to upgrades," he said in an interview. "We feel good that they're at the right level."United is making some changes next year, when the status flyers earn will apply to travel in 2027. The airline is changing how its so-called Plus Points — a currency beyond regular miles that can be earned by top-tier Platinum and 1K loyalty program elites — can be used. The carrier currently has a mileage chart, where customers need to earn set amounts for certain cabins, like its top Polaris long-haul business class. In 2027, it will move instead to dynamic pricing based on demand. United next year will also allow elites with high-level 1K status to earn Plus Points through co-branded credit card spending.The carrier also said status holders and United Chase credit card holders will also have "increased access" to Polaris Saver Award fares, which the airline said will make it easier to book in the top cabin.Airlines' lucrative loyalty programs bring in billions in profits, in part when the carriers sell miles to banks when customers earn them through credit card spending. Last year, United raised the amount customers had to spend to reach frequent flyer status in 2026. The thresholds to reach elite status in the airline's MileagePlus program went up about 25% and include either spending on a co-branded card or a combination of spending and flying.Last week, Delta said it would keep its earning requirements the same next year for 2027 status.American Airlines hasn't announced a change to its frequent flyer program elite thresholds this year. The carrier trails Delta and United in profits and is trying to win over more big spenders with refreshed cabins and lounges, though its rivals' decision to hold elite-earning requirements steady could pressure American to do the same.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 7, 03:49

David Ellison's hunt for WBD made David Zaslav richer — and it may not be over

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuThis isn't exactly what David Ellison had planned in September. Just a few months ago, the Paramount Skydance CEO sent a letter to the Warner Bros. Discovery board of directors arguing a combination of the two media and entertainment companies made sense. That letter was the first of several that offered increasingly higher prices to acquire the company along with arguments of why the assets were better together.Paramount's interest spurred a formal sale process — bringing Comcast and Netflix into the mix — which ultimately doubled the value of Warner Bros. Discovery shares and culminated, at least for the moment, in Paramount losing out in the bidding war it started. On Friday, Netflix announced a deal to acquire HBO Max and the famed Warner Bros. film studio for $27.75 per share, or an equity value of $72 billion. WBD will move forward with a plan to separate out its pay-TV networks, such as CNN and TNT Sports, before the deal closes. Instead of supercharging Paramount, just months after gaining control of the company through a merger with Skydance, Ellison effectively handed a prized jewel of the media and entertainment industry to its most dominant player, strengthening Netflix's reach and stripping Paramount and Comcast's NBCUniversal of an obvious merger target. "It wasn't for sale before, and they certainly hadn't cleaned up the assets or separated the assets in the way they have right now," said Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos in a conference call Friday morning after announcing the deal. "I think that kind of goes to the 'why now.'"Ellison jump-started a process that has made a lot of money for Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav, WBD's executive team and its shareholders. Zaslav currently owns more than 4.2 million shares of Warner Bros. Discovery, with another 6.2 million shares that would be delivered to him in the future via previously granted stock awards, according to Equilar. Zaslav also has a grant of almost 20.9 million options with an exercise price of $10.16, Equilar found.Based on the Netflix-WBD transaction price of $27.75 per share, all of that adds up to more than $554 million for the WBD CEO. Factoring in another 4 million shares that Zaslav is set to receive in January, according to a person close to the situation who declined to be named speaking about the executive's holdings, the true total is closer to $660 million.For shareholders, the sale process has brought a similar windfall. Warner Bros. Discovery stock closed at $12.54 on Sept. 10, the day before The Wall Street Journal reported Paramount was preparing a bid for the company. On Friday morning, Warner Bros. Discovery shares were up almost 3% to more than $25 apiece. That's more than double Warner Bros. Discovery's unaffected sale process price and a return to 2022 levels when WarnerMedia and Discovery first merged. That's vindication for Zaslav, who has spent nearly four years coming under fire from Hollywood and investors for failing to deliver for shareholders. With Friday's announcement, he's effectively pulled victory from the jaws of defeat. And still, Paramount is likely not done with its pursuit of buying all of Warner Bros. Discovery.Ellison has wasted no time at the helm of Paramount Skydance, transforming the company through deals and acquisitions.Since the merger closed in August, Paramount has brought on C-suite executives and high-profile Hollywood talent such as the Duffer Brothers. It secured the rights to develop a live-action feature film based on Activision's Call of Duty video game franchise and struck a $7.7 billion deal for UFC rights. Ellison's hunt for Warner Bros. Discovery was his biggest endeavor since taking control of the company.Paramount's lawyers sent a letter to Warner Bros. Discovery this week, first reported by CNBC, claiming the sale process had been rigged in Netflix's direction. Paramount has accused Warner Bros. Discovery of failing to properly consider its offer of $30, all-cash, and instead selling to Netflix as a predetermined outcome. Netflix made an initial bid for WBD's studio and streaming assets of $27 a share, according to a person familiar with the matter. That trumped Paramount's offer at the time and turned the trajectory of the sales talks in Netflix's direction, said the person, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private.Paramount was the only bidder interested in acquiring all of WBD's assets — the film studio, streaming service and TV networks. It has maintained that its offer is superior. Paramount's executives and advisors valued the Discovery Global networks portfolio at close to $2 a share, based on its predicted trading multiple and estimated leverage ratio, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. Discovery Global would include the CNN, TNT Sports and Discovery channels.Warner Bros. Discovery believes Discovery Global could have a value of $3 per share or more if it trades well in the public markets, according to other people with direct knowledge of the matter.Paramount has also argued there are tax efficiencies for shareholders in acquiring the whole company rather than buying only a portion of it, and that Netflix's bid comes with steeper regulatory risk. The Trump administration's view of the proposed combination is one of "heavy skepticism," CNBC reported Friday.Paramount offered a break-up fee of $5 billion if the proposed deal didn't get regulatory approval, according to the people familiar. Netflix's bid included a $5.8 billion break-up fee in case the deal doesn't get regulatory approval, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing Friday. Paramount is now weighing its options about whether to go straight to shareholders with one more improved bid — perhaps even higher than the $30-per-share, all-cash offer it submitted to WBD this week. If it does, Netflix would have a chance to match that bid. The end result would mean even more money for WBD shareholders — and more money for Zaslav.— CNBC's Nick Wells contributed to this report. Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 7, 03:47

The regulatory path ahead for a Netflix and Warner Bros. deal could get dicey

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuThe Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery deal came together quickly — but its path to regulatory approval may not be so speedy. Netflix stunned the media industry on Friday when it announced its proposed $72 billion deal to acquire the iconic Warner Bros. film studio and streaming service HBO Max. The combination brings together two of the most popular streaming platforms in the business. Netflix reported 300 million global subscribers as of late 2024, the last time it reported the metric. HBO Max had 128 million customers as of Sept. 30. Netflix currently claims 46% of mobile app monthly active users in global streaming, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. Combined with HBO Max, that share would rise to 56%, it found. "This deal cements Netflix's position as the premier streaming service for original content," according to a research note from analysts at William Blair on Friday.The size of the deal makes it ripe for scrutiny, from both industry insiders and U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration is viewing the merger with "heavy skepticism," CNBC reported Friday, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has already called for an antitrust review. "This deal looks like an anti-monopoly nightmare. A Netflix-Warner Bros. would create one massive media giant with control of close to half of the streaming market — threatening to force Americans into higher subscription prices and fewer choices over what and how they watch, while putting American workers at risk," Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in a statement. The merger would also give Netflix control over the famed Warner Bros. film studio, further consolidating the cinematic space and raising concerns that the number or typical windowing of popular releases could shrink. It's typical in the days and weeks following a deal announcement of this scale for interest groups, politicians and corporate competitors to call foul on antitrust grounds. The Department of Justice is most likely to review the deal, as it has other media mergers in the past, and it could take some time. DOJ reviews can take anywhere from months to more than a year. Netflix said Friday it expects the transaction to close in 12 to 18 months, after Warner Bros. Discovery spins out its portfolio of cable networks into Discovery Global. Netflix executives on Friday said they were "highly confident" the deal would win regulatory approval."You know, this deal is pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, it's pro-creator, it's pro-growth," Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said during an investor call following the acquisition announcement. "Our plans here are to work really closely with all the appropriate governments and regulators, but [we're] really confident that we're going to get all the necessary approvals that we need," Sarandos added. As part of the deal, Netflix has agreed to pay a $5.8 billion breakup fee to Warner Bros. Discovery if the deal were to get blocked by the government. Netflix's bid won out over competing offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast. Analysts at Deutsche Bank and William Blair were at least minimally convinced Friday of the potential for the deal to go through. "A merger of Warner Bros. Discovery and any of the three bidders would probably succeed, even if the DOJ were to sue to block a proposed combination," Deutsche Bank analysts wrote in a note on Friday, citing insights from a Department of Justice veteran who the analysts said "does not see any significant antitrust problems with any of the three scenarios." "However ... we don't know all of the detailed facts that will be collected and analyzed by the DOJ, nor do we know who the judge hearing the case will be, and both of these factors can have an impact on the outcome," the Deutsche Bank analysts noted. Paramount, for its part, has been fanning the flames. Paramount's lawyers sent a letter to Warner Bros. Discovery this week, first reported by CNBC, in which it argued the sale process had been rigged in Netflix's direction. The Wall Street Journal reported that in a separate letter, Paramount said a Netflix transaction would likely "never close" because of regulatory headwinds. Paramount was the only bidder looking to buy WBD's massive portfolio of pay-TV networks — and it's unlikely to walk away from the process quietly. Wall Street expected President Donald Trump's second term to usher in a windfall of dealmaking. However, economic uncertainty has slowed the process for some companies, and regulatory holdups have played a bigger role than anticipated. "Under Donald Trump, the antitrust review process has also become a cesspool of political favoritism and corruption," Warren said in Friday's statement. "The Justice Department must enforce our nation's anti-monopoly laws fairly and transparently — not use the Warner Bros. deal review to invite influence-peddling and bribery." Paramount's merger with Skydance was left in limbo for more than a year before it finally won federal approval in July. The Federal Communications Commission (which is unlikely to review the Netflix-WBD tie-up since it doesn't involve a broadcaster) signed off on the $8 billion merger shortly after Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to Trump to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Paramount had also ended its diversity, equity and inclusion policies earlier in the year after the FCC said it would investigate the company over its DEI programs. In September, the newly combined Paramount Skydance, run by David Ellison, set its sights on Warner Bros. Discovery. The company is now considering whether to take a hostile bid straight to WBD shareholders and try to unseat Netflix as the would-be buyer, CNBC reported Friday. Ellison's billionaire father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is known to be close with Trump. The argument for whether to clear Netflix's proposed takeover of Warner Bros. would likely come down to questions around streaming — first, on pricing for consumers, and second, on how to define Netflix's audience. The pricing of streaming subscriptions has risen across the board in recent years. In 2022 Netflix instituted a cheaper, ad-supported model after years of resistance in an effort to beckon more customers. The following year, Disney followed with its own more-affordable plan. Netflix is used to upending the legacy media industry. The company ended its DVD rentals business in 2023 and went all in on streaming. It's since found massive scale and has taken over the zeitgeist with original series like "Squid Game," "Wednesday," "Stranger Things," and "Bridgerton." Its maverick approach to media and its broadening foothold in the industry may be its saving grace in the eyes of regulators. "My expectation on the regulatory side is Netflix is going to advocate and argue with their advisors for a very expansive definition of what their market is ... so that would include broadcast, cable, subscription and ad-supported streaming," said said Jeff Goldstein, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners, and co-lead of the U.S. Media group. "And really, really, really importantly, that would include YouTube," he said.YouTube has come to dominate the industry when it comes to viewership. Nielsen once again reported in October than YouTube had the largest share of TV usage, with Netflix in sixth place and Warner Bros. Discovery in seventh place. Traditional media companies with linear networks — Disney, NBCUniversal, Fox and Paramount — filled the spots in between. Critics of the deal will define Netflix's reach more narrowly to try to demonstrate outsized dominance, said Goldstein. "I believe that streaming is not a category. Television viewership is a category ... you know, eyeballs might be a category," media industry titan John Malone told CNBC in November when asked about antitrust questions surrounding the WBD sale process. "But if you're going to broaden the category to that, you got to take in YouTube and Facebook and the social networks, TikTok," he said. "I mean, that's really the question, is streaming a category? ... Are studios a category ... and is that going to get looked at hard? These regulatory things are a little bit difficult to predict." — CNBC's Julia Boorstin contributed to this report. Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 6, 13:00

From the California gold rush to Sydney Sweeney: How denim became the most enduring garment in American fashion

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuIn the dwindling days of the California gold rush, the wife of a local miner faced a problem. Her husband's denim work pants kept ripping, so her tailor, Jacob Davis, had the idea to add copper rivets to key points of strain, like the pocket corners and the base of the button fly, to keep them from tearing. Davis' "riveted pants" soon became a roaring success and, unbeknownst to him at the time, marked the official birth of the blue jean, a garment that would transform fashion and come to represent the United States around the globe. "It really has democratized American fashion and it also is the greatest export that we have sent to the world, because people identify jeans specifically with American Western culture," said Shawn Grain Carter, a fashion professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology in New York. "It doesn't matter your economic or social class. It doesn't matter what your views are in terms of the political spectrum. Everybody wears denim." These days, denim is a major sales driver for retailers big and small, as the global denim market reached $101 billion this year, up 28% from 2020, according to data from market research company Euromonitor International. Major apparel companies from American Eagle to Levi Strauss are in a race to corner that market, leaning on A-list celebrities like Sydney Sweeney and Beyonce to win over shoppers and drive sales in an unsteady economy.But if it weren't for Levi Strauss, founder of the eponymous blue jeans company, Davis' invention may not have gone far beyond the railroad town where it was created in the early 1870s. Soon after Davis created his riveted pants, called "waist overalls" or "overalls" at the time, they began selling like "hot cakes" and he needed a business partner to secure a patent, said Tracey Panek, Levi's in-house historian. So he wrote to Strauss, a Bavarian-born immigrant who was running a successful wholesale business in San Francisco and had supplied Davis the denim he used to create his riveted pants. "The secret of them Pents is the Rivits that I put in those Pockets and I found the demand so large that I cannot make them up fast enough," Davis wrote Strauss in a letter, according to PBS. Strauss, an "astute" businessman, recognized the opportunity and agreed to partner with Davis, said Panek. "This would have been the first time that Levi was actually" manufacturing his own products, said Panek. "He was no longer just importing and selling other people's goods. He was manufacturing himself and selling to retailers."On May 20, 1873, the two men secured a patent for the riveted pants and eventually opened a factory on Fremont Street, close to the modern-day Salesforce tower in San Francisco's financial district. They promised to offer workers the most durable jeans on the market and soon, business was booming. Through Strauss' connections as a wholesaler, the company's riveted overalls soon spread across the U.S., becoming the garment of choice for working men everywhere: miners, cowboys, farmers – any role that required durable clothing. Jeans were exclusively reserved for work settings at the time, but as emerging denim manufacturers vied for a similar customer base, they looked to expand their assortment to drive sales. "Slowly and steadily into the 20th century, you start to see some of these manufacturers making variations," said Sonya Abrego, a New York City-based fashion historian. "There was this one design called spring bottom pants that was kind of a more form fitted, a more dressed up, a slightly flared, maybe what the factory foreman would be wearing, right? As opposed to just the guy on the shop floor."In 1934, Levi created the first ever line of jeans for women. Around that time, denim started to become more popular in settings outside of work, primarily for activities like dude ranch vacations, camping and horseback riding. "So they were kind of taking on a cowboy's garment or a worker's garment but wearing it in a … resort setting," said Abrego. Courtesy: Levi Strauss & Co. Dude ranch vacations had become popular because there were finally highways connecting different parts of the country, and few were willing to venture to Europe during a war. Companies like Levi began releasing advertisements highlighting their denim as "dude ranch duds" and "authentic western riding wear" to capture shoppers looking for jeans to bring with them on vacation, according to archival advertisements from the time. These cultural moments helped to expand denim beyond workers, but jeans didn't become widespread casual attire until after World War II, when American fashion overall started to shift. By the time World War II ended, the mighty American consumer was beginning to emerge. For years, Americans had been forced to ration common goods like rubber, sugar and meat while simultaneously being encouraged to save their money by buying war bonds and socking away spare cash.When the country shifted from wartime to peacetime, Americans were ready to splurge and soon began spending big on new cars, appliances and clothes. "With a little bit more money to spend, you start seeing a bigger push for leisure clothes and fun clothes and play clothes, clothes to wear to backyard barbecues," said Abrego. "Clothes that we would consider today as just like casual style." Slowly and surely, it became more and more acceptable for both men and women to wear jeans outside of work settings. Then, denim manufacturers made a push to allow jeans in schools. "They wanted to sell to as many people as they possibly could," said Abrego. "The idea that jeans are good for school means that they're good for every day."By the time the 1960s hit, denim manufacturers had expanded their products and were selling a wide variety of colors, fits and styles. It became a symbol of the hippie movement and a mainstay on Hollywood sets. Soon, denim was everywhere, and the 1970s brought the iconic bell bottom pants and the first iteration of the "designer jean" — denim pants being produced by labels and brands whose designs had nothing to do with work wear or western wear, like Calvin Klein and Gloria Vanderbilt. Since then, denim has remained a constant in global fashion. While silhouettes, washes and fits have changed over time, jeans never really go out of style, which is what makes them so enduring, said Abrego. "This is a design from 1873 … do we see anything else from 1873 on the street? It's kind of wild if you think about it that way," said Abrego. "We can talk about all the details, all the changes in manufacturing and all the different fits and finishes but it's a recognizable thing, it's still a pair of jeans. For me as a historian, that continuity is so compelling because I can't really name anything else that has stayed the same to this degree." Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 18:06

Netflix's plan to buy Warner Bros. throws the theater industry into upheaval

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuMovie theater operators woke up Friday to the possibility of a new world order.Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery announced a deal for the streaming giant to acquire WBD's film studio and streaming service, bringing an end to a months-long bidding process that saw Paramount Skydance and Comcast also vying for the assets.With Netflix as the victor, exhibitors are in a panic. Unlike traditional movie studios, the streamer has not adhered to conventional theatrical distribution, and there are fears that big changes could be coming to an industry that is still struggling post-pandemic."It's no secret that this was probably the least desired outcome for many theater owners," said Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango and founder of Box Office Theory. "There are no two ways around that. This may be one of the most meaningful days in the history of the business, but it could yet be a constructive one for cinema if Netflix honors early indications that it will maintain the theatrical business model of Warner Bros. properties and lean into those unique strengths which are not replicable on the streaming platform."Cinema United, the world's largest exhibition trade association, came out strong Friday morning against the sale of WBD assets to Netflix."The proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. by Netflix poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business," CEO Michael O'Leary said in a statement. "The negative impact of this acquisition will impact theatres from the biggest circuits to one-screen independents in small towns in the United States and around the world."A half dozen movie theater operators who spoke to CNBC shared concerns that Netflix's acquisition of WBD would lead to a significant decline in the number of films made available to cinemas annually and, therefore, hit annual box office ticket sales."Netflix's stated business model does not support theatrical exhibition. In fact, it is the opposite," O'Leary said. Cinema United said the deal "would risk removing 25% of the annual domestic box office" putting smaller theater chains and independent cinemas, in particular, at risk."We are going to be pulling all of the levers we can because we think that a deal of this magnitude and the potential impact that it will have is something that everyone with regulatory and oversight authority needs to look closely at," O'Leary said on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" Friday. "So, we've already been talking to people at the federal level, at the state level and internationally because this is a significant, significant threat, we believe, to the long-term viability of the theatrical exhibition."And Cinema United isn't the only group worried about the future of the industry if the Netflix deal is approved.A collective of top industry players sent an open letter to Congress detailing the potential economic and institutional blowback that could play out if the merger goes through.The letter, reported by Variety, stated that Netflix would "effectively hold a noose around the theatrical marketplace" and could alter the footprint of theatrical movies and decrease licensing fees paid in post-theatrical windows.Several exhibitors told CNBC that they fear a deal between WBD and Netflix will result in fewer theatrical releases and even shorter theatrical windows for would-be major releases.Consolidation in the studio space has been a growing issue for the theatrical industry in recent years. When studios merge, they typically decrease the number of films they produce, something the industry saw firsthand when Disney bought 20th Century Fox back in 2019.The theatrical business has struggled in recent years from pandemic related production shutdowns as well as dual labor strikes that halted film shoots and delayed movie releases. The industry still has not returned to pre-pandemic release numbers or box office ticket sales, and there are worries that it never will."If you look historically, when legacy studios are absorbed by other entities, even in the case where those other entities are also legacy studios, the amount of movies produced for theatrical distribution goes down," O'Leary told CNBC Friday. Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said during an investor call Friday morning following the deal announcement that planned Warner Bros. releases "will continue to go to the theaters through Warner Bros."Sarandos doesn't plan to alter WBD's current business practices, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. Still, he does plan to meet with theater owners in an effort to assuage any concerns and to explain his vision that movies should have shorter exclusive theatrical windows, the person said. For exhibitors, shrinking theatrical windows pose a major threat. Prior to the pandemic, movies typically played in theaters for between 70 and 90 days before entering the home market. Following Covid shutdowns, studios and cinemas renegotiated these terms, and the average window fell to 30 to 45 days.Netflix, however, has never followed these guidelines. The company has long held that its content is meant for its streaming subscribers and therefore should be delivered to them at home, on the service as soon as possible. If Netflix does release a film in cinemas, it's usually only for the minimum requirement to be eligible for awards contention or for weekend stints as one-off events. When Netflix does go to theaters, it doesn't report box office figures publicly. That's left industry analysts wondering if the company will continue WBD's transparency when it comes to ticket sales once the deal is finalized."We've released about 30 films into theaters this year, so it's not like we have this opposition to movies in the theaters," Sarandos said during Friday's investor call. "My pushback has been mostly in the fact of the long exclusive windows, which we don't really think are that consumer friendly.""Netflix movies will take the same strides they have, which is some of them do have a short run in the theater beforehand, but our primary goal is to bring first-run movies to our members, because that's what they're looking for," he said. Of course, that strategy could shift in the coming years. Alicia Reese, an analyst at Wedbush, highlighted in a research note Friday that the theatrical slate has already been negotiated through 2029."So any buyer would have to honor those contracts by showing the slated WBD films in theaters for at least the next four years," Reese wrote.One theater chain operator, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share candid thoughts, told CNBC, "All exhibition can do is take Netflix at their word." "In the deal they have pledged to continue to release legacy WB titles to theatres," the operator said. "Now does that mean with a one-week window, a four-week window or no window? Netflix will have to diametrically alter their corporate philosophy of streaming first. We just have to wait to see. It's not great for exhibition."— CNBC's Alex Sherman and Stephen Desaulniers contributed to this report. Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of Fandango and NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of Fandango and CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 18:04

RFK Jr.’s vaccine panel weakens recommendation on hepatitis B shot for babies, scrapping universal guidance

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuHealth and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s handpicked vaccine committee voted on Friday to do away with the long-standing, universal recommendation that all babies receive a hepatitis B shot at birth, issuing weaker guidance for certain infants. The group, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, recommended that parents use individual decision-making in consultation with a health-care provider to determine when or if to give the hepatitis B birth dose to a baby whose mother tested negative for the virus. For babies who don't receive the birth dose, the committee recommended that they wait to receive a first vaccine until they are at least 2 months old. The acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still has to sign off on that new recommendation. The CDC currently recommends that every baby get vaccinated against hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, regardless of their mother's testing status. The move overturns that guidance, which has been credited with driving down infections in children by 99% since it was first introduced three decades ago and is widely considered to be a public health success story. Some committee members and public health experts warn that the change could have wide-ranging consequences, such as an increase in infections among kids. The vote only affects the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine series. The second would still be given one to two months after birth, with a third dose between 6 and 18 months of age. All pregnant people are supposed to be tested for hepatitis B during pregnancy. During previous meetings, some advisors questioned the need for babies to receive a shot if their mothers test negative. But test results can produce false negatives, some people become infected later in pregnancy after being tested and babies can get infected by other members of their household. The panel's closely watched two-day meeting in Atlanta comes after Kennedy gutted the committee and appointed 12 new members, including some well-known vaccine critics. ACIP sets recommendations on who should receive certain shots and which vaccines insurers must cover at no cost. Eight members voted yes, while three voted no. Some advisors strongly pushed back on the new guidance ahead of the vote. "This has a great potential to cause harm, and I hope that the committee accepts the responsibility when this harm is caused," said Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, psychiatrist and voting member. Dr. Cody Meissner, voting member and professor of pediatrics at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, said he hopes that pediatricians will continue to administer the birth dose within the first 24 hours of delivery and before discharge from the hospital. "To follow any other course is not in the interest of infants," he said. Meissner added that more children will be injured and will catch hepatitis B infections. Hepatitis B, which can be passed from mother to baby during childbirth, can lead to liver disease and early death. Infants are more vulnerable to developing chronic hepatitis B infections, which have no cure. "We will see hepatitis B come back," he said. "The vaccine is so effective. It does not make sense in my mind to change the immunization schedule."In a statement Friday, the American Medical Association said the vote is "reckless and undermines decades of public confidence in a proven, lifesaving vaccine." The group added that the decision was not based on scientific evidence and "creates confusion for parents about how best to protect their newborns."Meanwhile, Retsef Levi, a voting member and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor, falsely claimed during meetings that experts have "never tested" the hepatitis B vaccine "appropriately." Some committee members raised concerns about vaccinating during the so-called neonatal period, which is a critical window of development for the brain and immune system. But decades of evidence show that the hepatitis B shot has been safely administered to newborns. Other advisors said there is no evidence supporting the two-month delay to the birth dose."We have to make decisions with the data that we have, and we must use only the credible data to make the decisions, and not speculations and not hypotheses," said Hibbeln. A 2024 CDC study showed that the current vaccination schedule has helped prevent more than 6 million hepatitis B infections and nearly 1 million hepatitis B-related hospitalizations.Merck and GSK manufacture the hepatitis B vaccines used starting at birth. Neither of the shots are significant revenue drivers for the companies, so the new recommendations should not have a material impact on their businesses. Still, Merck said in a statement Friday that it is "deeply concerned" by the vote, which it said risks "reversing this progress and puts infants at unnecessary risk of chronic infection, liver cancer and even death." The company added that "there is no evidence delaying it provides any benefit to children." In a statement, GSK said, "we await additional information and an official adoption of today's recommendations by CDC to fully understand the potential impact."The panel's vote will not affect insurance coverage for the shots, including under Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, Andrew Johnson, principal policy analyst for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, told the members during the meeting. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 17:42

Netflix to buy Warner Bros. film and streaming assets in $72 billion deal

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuNetflix announced Friday it's reached a deal to buy pieces of Warner Bros. Discovery, bringing a swift end to a dramatic bidding process that saw Paramount Skydance and Comcast also vying for the legacy assets. The transaction is comprised of cash and stock and is valued at $27.75 per WBD share, the companies said. That puts the equity value of the deal at $72 billion, with a total enterprise value of approximately $82.7 billion. Netflix will acquire Warner Bros.' film studio and streaming service, HBO Max. Warner Bros. Discovery will move forward with its previously planned spinout of Discovery Global, which includes its massive portfolio of pay TV networks, such as TNT and CNN. The blockbuster deal brings together the streaming giant Netflix, which has upended the media industry in recent years, and the storied Warner Bros. film studio, known for its library including "The Wizard of Oz," the Harry Potter franchise and the DC comics universe. It will also include the content of HBO Max, including "The Sopranos" and "Game of Thrones.""I know some of you're surprised that we're making this acquisition, and I certainly understand why. Over the years, we have been known to be builders, not buyers," Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said on an investor call Friday morning. "We already have incredible shows and movies and a great business model, and it's working for talent, it's working for consumers and it's working for shareholders. This is a rare opportunity," he said. "It's going to help us achieve our mission to entertain the world and to bring people together through great stories."Netflix's initial bid for WBD's studio and streaming assets was for $27 a share, according to a person familiar with the matter. That trumped Paramount's offer at the time and turned the trajectory of the sales talks in Netflix's direction, said the person, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private.The acquisition is expected to close after the TV networks separation takes place, now expected in the third quarter of 2026. The companies estimated the transaction would close in 12 to 18 months. CNBC has reached out to Comcast and Paramount for comment.As part of the deal, every Warner Bros. Discovery shareholder will receive $23.25 in cash and $4.50 in shares of Netflix common stock for each share of WBD common stock outstanding following the close of the deal. Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery said each of their boards of directors unanimously approved the deal, which is subject to regulatory approval as well as approval of WBD shareholders. Netflix has agreed to pay a $5.8 billion reverse break-up fee if the deal is not approved, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Warner Bros. Discovery would pay a $2.8 billion breakup fee if it decides to call off the deal to pursue a different merger.The merger could invite regulatory scrutiny given the size of the expansive streaming businesses for each company. Netflix said it surpassed 300 million global streaming subscribers at the end of 2024, the last time it publicly reported its customer count. Warner Bros. Discovery said it had 128 million global subscribers as of Sept. 30. Paramount raised the potential for antitrust concerns earlier this week in a letter to Warner Bros. Discovery management as second-round bids came in, The Wall Street Journal reported. The newly merged Paramount Skydance made its initial run at Warner Bros. Discovery in September, submitting three bids before WBD launched a formal sale process. The David Ellison-run company was the only suitor bidding for the entirety of WBD's portfolio — the film studio, streaming business and TV networks.Paramount's final bid, received Thursday evening, was for $30 per share, all cash, people close to the matter told CNBC, speaking on the condition of anonymity about confidential dealings. Paramount's offer included a $5 billion breakup fee if the transaction didn't win regulatory approval after roughly 10 months, the people said. Earlier this week, Paramount raised questions about the "fairness and adequacy" of the sale process, contending Warner Bros. Discovery favored Netflix."It has become increasingly clear, through media reporting and otherwise, that WBD appears to have abandoned the semblance and reality of a fair transaction process, thereby abdicating its duties to stockholders, and embarked on a myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder," Paramount attorneys said in a letter to Warner Bros. Discovery management.— CNBC's David Faber, Kasey O'Brien and Laya Neelakandan contributed to this report.Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 13:58

Southwest Airlines cuts outlook on government shutdown demand hit, higher fuel costs

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuSouthwest Airlines cut its 2025 earnings forecast Friday, citing a demand dip during the federal government shutdown, the longest ever.The carrier said it expects 2025 earnings before interest and taxes of about $500 million, down from a previous forecast of $600 million to $800 million, because of lower revenue in the shutdown and higher fuel prices. "Following the temporary decline in demand related to the shutdown, bookings have returned to previous expectations," Southwest said in a securities filing.Earlier this week, Delta Air Lines said the impasse cost it $200 million but added that demand looks strong going into 2026.The shutdown disrupted travel as air traffic controller shortages worsened around the country. Controllers were among the federal workers required to work despite not receiving regular paychecks during the more than 40-day shutdown.The Trump administration required airlines to trim their schedules and cancel flights, citing increased pressure on air traffic controllers in the closure. However, disruptions on some days surpassed the required cuts.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 13:15

$208 million wiped out: Yieldstreet investors rack up more losses as firm rebrands to Willow Wealth

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuAs Yieldstreet tries to distance itself from a rocky past with a new name and ad campaign, its customers are dealing with a present reality that is increasingly dire.The private markets investing startup, freshly rebranded as Willow Wealth, last week informed customers of new defaults on real estate projects in Houston and Nashville, Tennessee, CNBC has learned.The letters, obtained and verified by CNBC, account for about $41 million in new losses. They come on the heels of $89 million in marine loan wipeouts disclosed in September and $78 million in losses revealed by CNBC in an August report.In total, Willow Wealth investors have lost at least $208 million, according to CNBC reporting.Willow Wealth also removed a decade of historical performance data from public view in recent weeks. A chart on the company's website showing annualized returns of negative 2% for real estate investments from 2015 to 2025 — down from 9.4% gains just two years prior — has been taken down."They had to change their name," said Mark Williams, a professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business. "Their old name had negative value to it, so they're trying to do a 2.0 to restart things. They're also making it harder to uncover their poor performance by removing the stats, which is alarming."The high-stakes rebranding is the latest chapter for a company that sought to empower retail investors, but instead left some of them saddled with deep losses and years of uncertainty.Under its former name, Willow Wealth — backed by prominent venture firms and buoyed by aggressive online marketing — had been the best known of a wave of American startups that promised to broaden access to the alternative investments that are the domain of institutions and rich families.But the still-unfolding collapse of its real estate funds demonstrates the risks the private markets hold for retail investors. By their very nature, private investments don't trade on exchanges and lack standardized disclosures. That leaves investors especially reliant on private fund managers, both for information and to safeguard their interests for years while their money is locked up in deals.Private markets have gained in prominence this year after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to allow the investments in retirement plans.While critics say that opaque, illiquid investments with high management fees aren't appropriate for ordinary investors, asset managers including BlackRock and Apollo Global Management see retail as a vast untapped pool of capital. Retirement giant Empower said in May that it would allow private assets into the 401(k) plans of participating employers with help from firms including Apollo and Goldman Sachs.Against this backdrop, Willow Wealth CEO Mitch Caplan, a former E-Trade chief who took the helm in May, said the company was heading toward a new model. Instead of only offering deals sourced by the startup, it would also sell private market funds from Wall Street giants including Goldman and Carlyle Group.The company no longer provides the historical performance of its offerings because of the pivot to third party-managed funds, according to a person with knowledge of the situation who asked for anonymity to discuss internal strategy."Transparency is paramount to us, and we consistently provide strategy-specific performance information for each manager at the offering level to support informed decision making," said a Willow Wealth spokeswoman.As for CNBC's reporting on the new real estate defaults and rising tally of losses, the Willow Wealth spokeswoman called it a "rehash" of news on "investments from five years ago.""The investments in question represent a very small portion of our overall portfolio and do not reflect the current nature of our offerings or business focus," she said.The firm declined to say how much it manages in assets.The startup — founded in 2015 by Michael Weisz and Milind Mehere, who remain on Willow Wealth's board of directors — told customers that private investments would provide both higher returns and lower volatility than traditional assets.Willow Wealth's pitch hasn't changed much, despite the rebrand.In a new ad campaign, a character called Hampton Dumpty says that he's "learned a thing or two about crashes" and therefore uses Willow Wealth to diversify his portfolio with private market assets including real estate.The mascot, a play on the Humpty-Dumpty nursery rhyme, tells viewers that "portfolios including private markets have outperformed traditional ones for the past 20 years."On its revamped website, the firm has a chart showing a hypothetical portfolio made of private equity, private credit and real estate outperforming traditional stocks and bonds over the decade through 2025.But the chart doesn't include the impact of fees, which are typically far higher for private investments than for stock ETFs and mutual funds. The company also notes in a disclosure that customers can't actually invest in the private market indexes listed.While most stock ETFs carry fees below 0.2%, Willow Wealth typically charges 10 times more than that, or 2% annually on unreturned funds, for its real estate offerings, according to product documents.Willow Wealth also charged an array of one-time fees associated with the creation of the funds, including for structuring the deal and arranging the loans.Fees for Willow Wealth's new products are even higher. The company charges about 1.4% annually for access to portfolios made up of private funds from Goldman Sachs, Carlyle and the StepStone Group, according to its website.Those firms also charge their own fees, leading to all-in annual costs ranging from about 3.3% to 6.7% per fund, according to the providers' documents.That makes Willow Wealth's products among the most expensive in the retail investing universe.For customers still coming to terms with their losses and who remain in limbo on funds that the firm says are on "watchlist" for possible default, Yieldstreet's transformation into Willow Wealth looks like an effort to evade accountability, the customers told CNBC.After last week's disclosures, nine out of the 30 real estate deals reviewed by CNBC since August are now in default. That 30% failure rate is high, even by the standards of the private assets world, said Boston University's Williams.Though the realm of private credit is more opaque, making average default rates difficult to pinpoint, some in the industry estimate typical failure rates of between 2% and 8%.Whether they were apartments in hot downtown areas or established cities, or single-family homes scattered across Southern boomtowns, projects that Willow Wealth put its customers into struggled to hit revenue targets and fell behind on loan payments.Willow Wealth has blamed the failures on the Federal Reserve's interest rate hiking cycle in 2022, which made repaying floating-rate debt harder.Among newly disclosed defaults are a pair of funds tied to a 268-unit luxury apartment building in East Nashville called Stacks on Main.Investors hoping to earn the advertised 16.4% annual return put a combined $18.2 million into the two funds, according to documents reviewed by CNBC. They later added another $2 million in a member loan meant to stabilize the deal."Your equity investment is expected to incur a full loss" after selling Stacks on Main on Nov. 25, Willow Wealth told customers in a letter dated that same day. Investors in the member loan will lose up to 60%, the company said."We understand this is difficult news to receive," Willow Wealth told customers. "We share in your disappointment."Documents for the 2022 transactions listed Nazare Capital, the family office of former WeWork CEO Adam Neumann, as the sponsor for the deal. Real estate sponsors typically source, acquire and manage deals on behalf of investors.In 2022, after his WeWork tenure ended, Neumann founded property startup Flow, which took on some of the real estate deals from his family office.In public comments to news outlets over the past year, representatives from Flow have sought to distance the company from the travails of then-Yieldstreet.But according to the 2022 investment memo, Nazare purchased Stacks on Main in July 2021 for $79 million and then offloaded a majority stake to Yieldstreet members through a joint venture.Crucially, the transaction saddled the joint venture with $62.1 million in debt, a burden which would later prove instrumental in the deal's failure, CNBC found. "This building was majority-owned by YieldStreet and the property was never operated either by Flow or anyone associated with Adam," a spokeswoman for Neumann told CNBC. "In any event, the building has been sold and Flow no longer has a minority interest nor any involvement in this property." Nazare was also listed as sponsor for another Nashville project that went sideways for retail investors, an apartment complex at 2010 West End Ave. That project resulted in $35 million in losses across two funds, wipeouts that were previously reported by CNBC.Besides the deals tied to Nazare, there were other defaults.A project called the Houston Multi-Family Equity fund, made up of apartments across suburban Texas, resulted in a loss of all $21 million of customer funds, the startup told investors in a Nov. 25 letter. "The property was unable to generate sufficient revenue to pay monthly debt service and operating expenses" and went into foreclosure, resulting in a "full loss of the equity," Willow Wealth said.The tally of Willow Wealth's investor losses is likely to rise further.For instance, an $11.6 million loan made by Willow Wealth customers for a Portland, Oregon, multifamily project is "currently in default" after an appraisal found that the borrower owed more than the real estate was worth, the company told investors.Willow Wealth is trying to restructure the borrower's loan to avoid selling the property for a loss, the company said in a letter to investors.The company has also warned investors that a Tucson, Arizona, apartment complex and two projects made up of single-family rental homes across Southern states were likely to result in future losses of unspecified amounts, according to separate letters. Investors put more than $63 million combined into those deals.Williams, the Boston University professor and a former Federal Reserve bank examiner, said he taught a class this fall on how Willow Wealth and other fintech firms failed to protect their customers."They claimed they were going to democratize access to the types of deals only the rich had," Williams said. "In reality, they created a high-risk trap for investors."Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 5, 10:05

Paramount questions Warner Bros. Discovery on 'fairness and adequacy' of sale process: Read the full letter

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuParamount Skydance is calling foul on how Warner Bros. Discovery has conducted its sale process. In a letter reviewed by CNBC, Paramount attorneys told Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav that Paramount was questioning the "fairness and adequacy" of the process, which officially launched in October. This week, Paramount, Netflix and Comcast submitted second-round bids to acquire some or all of Warner Bros. Discovery's assets, CNBC previously reported. "It has become increasingly clear, through media reporting and otherwise, that WBD appears to have abandoned the semblance and reality of a fair transaction process, thereby abdicating its duties to stockholders, and embarked on a myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder," reads the letter from attorneys at Quinn Emanuel. "We specifically request and expect this letter will be shared and discussed with the full board of directors of WBD."In particular, Paramount's letter calls out reports that WBD's management appears to favor Netflix's offer. Netflix has made an offer of mostly cash, while Paramount's latest bid was all cash, according to people close to the matter who declined to be named speaking about confidential dealings. All three companies submitted higher bids than their initial offers, the people told CNBC.As of Thursday morning, Netflix was the leading bidder based on how WBD is valuing the offers, people familiar told CNBC. Comcast executives, for their part, continue to be disciplined in the company's offer as to not anger shareholders by taking on additional debt and risking its balance sheet, according to people familiar with that company's thinking. Comcast leadership has previously said that its bar for M&A is generally high.Warner Bros. Discovery told CNBC it confirmed to Paramount that it had received the letter and would share it with members of the WBD board. "Please be assured that the WBD Board attends to its fiduciary obligations with the utmost care, and that they have fully and robustly complied with them and will continue to do so," the company said in its response to Paramount. WBD requested third-round bids from the potential buyers, due Thursday, sources told CNBC. The company expects to announce a winner as early as next week, sources said.While first-round bids arrived in mid-November, Paramount has been vying to acquire the entirety of Warner Bros. Discovery — which includes its streaming service HBO Max, film studio Warner Bros. and a portfolio of cable TV networks like TNT and TBS — since September, CNBC previously reported. Warner Bros. Discovery rebuffed three offers made by Paramount, the last of the those for $23.50 a share, before launching a formal sale process to beckon other buyers, CNBC previously reported. Netflix and Comcast are interested only in WBD's streaming and film studio business, CNBC has reported. Prior to the sale process Warner Bros. Discovery had begun the process of splitting its company into two — Warner Bros., the streaming and studio businesses which would be led by Zaslav, and Discovery Global, the cable TV networks division that would be run by current WBD CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels. Paramount attorneys sent the letter as the company suspects that Zaslav has been biased against a merger with Paramount since the outset, and instead, would rather complete its path toward a separation, some of the people familiar told CNBC. Paramount and its advisors have viewed WBD's contact with them as more obstructionist rather than constructive, two of the people said. Before the sale process, Zaslav had been known to tell colleagues that Amazon's Prime Video or Netflix would likely be interested suitors in Warner Bros. Discovery, or specifically HBO Max and the film studio, the people said. In the letter, Paramount asks the WBD board if reporting that WBD management has "chemistry" with Netflix management is accurate. Paramount is seeking confirmation, according to the letter, of whether Warner Bros. Discovery appointed an independent special committee of disinterested members of its board to steer the sale process and consider offers. "If not, we strongly urge you to empower such a special committee comprised of directors with no potential appearance of bias or beholdenness to others whose interests may differ from those of the stockholders," the letter reads. "This would seem to be an important step at this stage, to ensure the fairness and unimpeachability of the transaction process and to maximize the value of whatever outcome WBD determines to pursue."Dear Mr. Zaslav: We write on behalf of Paramount Skydance Corporation ("Paramount", "we" or "us") to express our serious concerns about the fairness and adequacy of the bidding process for a potential combination with Warner Bros. Discovery ("WBD" or "you"). It has become increasingly clear, through media reporting and otherwise, that WBD appears to have abandoned the semblance and reality of a fair transaction process, thereby abdicating its duties to stockholders, and embarked on a myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder. We specifically request and expect this letter will be shared and discussed with the full board of directors of WBD.We have recently seen reporting in the U.S. and foreign media that gives serious cause for concern. The German newspaper Handelsblatt recently reported on a meeting that reportedly took place in Brussels between Gerhard Zieler, President of WBD's International Business and a direct report to WBD's Chief Executive Officer, who "arrived with a three-person team," with the E.U. Commission Vice President Hena Virkkunen, to discuss the potential merger prospects for WBD. In that conversation, the article reports that "concerns were raised that the Ellison family's planned acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery could lead to excessive media concentration," and that the E.U. Commission would consider intervening in a potential merger with Paramount for this reason. The article quotes "sources close" to Zeiler as saying "that the talks with the Commission were important because both Warner and the EU wanted to preserve media diversity." The implications of such a meeting, if it occurred, are clear and evince a tacit resistance to, if not active sabotage of, a Paramount offer.While this report is concerning in itself, this is not an isolated report regarding purported WBD resistance to a combination with Paramount. Several U.S. media outlets have reported on the enthusiasm by WBD management for a transaction with Netflix, and on statements by management that a transaction between WBD and Netflix would be a "slam dunk," while also referring to Paramount's bid in a negative light. Additional reporting since the submission of revised bids on December 1 has indicated that WBD's "board has really warmed to" a transaction with Netflix due to the "chemistry between" WBD management and Netflix management. We have come to you first to inquire whether this reporting is accurate, and to engage in a productive discussion with you around any actual or perceived issues that it may reflect.Moreover, these media reports echo similar indications that we have been hearing throughout this process, despite what we viewed as otherwise productive conversations that we have had with WBD leadership. Paramount has a credible basis to believe that the sales process has been tainted by management conflicts, including certain members of management's potential personal interests in post-transaction roles and compensation as a result of the economic incentives embedded in recent amendments to employment arrangements. These concerns are amplified by indications of director bias and beholdenness to others whose interests may not align with the stockholders', and the fact that alternatives involving only certain WBD assets are being prioritized notwithstanding their heightened regulatory risk and potential to deprive stockholders of consideration for the entirety of WBD's enterprise value.Further, as you know, Paramount agreed to certain standstill arrangements in exchange for the opportunity to participate in a truly competitive and unbiased bidding process. Paramount did not bargain for WBD to foster, whether intentionally or unintentionally, a tilted and unfair process. We believe that all parties to this process should have a shared desire for, and will mutually benefit from, an unimpeachable transaction process. As we assume you agree, even discounting the accuracy of any media reports, just the appearance of a flawed process imperils any potential transaction that might result and may undermine the potential value maximization to WBD stockholders from any prospective transaction.In light of our grave concerns regarding the integrity of WBD's process, we seek confirmation as to whether WBD has appointed an independent special committee of disinterested members of its board to consider the potential transaction opportunities and to make a final determination regarding a sale or break-up of all or part of the company. If not, we strongly urge you to empower such a special committee comprised of directors with no potential appearance of bias or beholdenness to others whose interests may differ from those of the stockholders. This would seem to be an important step at this stage, to ensure the fairness and unimpeachability of the transaction process and to maximize the value of whatever outcome WBD determines to pursue. Engaging with WBD throughout this process, we have been encouraged by the enormous potential from a combination of our entities. We remain confident that the Paramount offer would provide the maximum value to WBD stockholders and look forward to the opportunity to continue to engage with you productively in this process. But at this point we must insist on assurances and steps taken to ensure that a truly fair and independent process is being conducted, both for Paramount's benefit and in the interest of WBD's stockholders.Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 22:31

Ulta shares pop as beauty retailer hikes sales and earnings outlook for second straight quarter

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuUlta Beauty on Thursday raised its full-year sales outlook after topping Wall Street's fiscal third-quarter expectations and seeing shoppers splurge on perfumes, skincare items and more.The beauty retailer said it now expects net sales for the year to be approximately $12.3 billion, higher than its previous expectations of $12 billion to $12.1 billion. That would would represent an increase from last fiscal year's net sales of $11.3 billion. It expects earnings per share of $25.20 to $25.50, up from its prior expectations of $23.85 to $24.30.It anticipates comparable sales, a metric that includes sales at stores open at least 14 months and e-commerce sales, to rise by 4.4% to 4.7%, up from its prior outlook of 2.5% to 3.5%. Ulta has raised its sales and profit outlook for two consecutive quarters. The company's stock rose more than 6% in extended trading.In a news release, CEO Kecia Steelman said "exciting assortment newness, improved in-store and digital experiences, and bold marketing efforts are resonating with our guests and drove strong sales results."On the company's earnings call, she said that Ulta is "pleased with our Black Friday and Cyber Monday performance" and ready for the shopping season — even one when consumers may be more selective about spending."Our insights suggest beauty consumers' budgets are tight and they are focused on value," she said. "Despite this, beauty enthusiasts tell us that they spend intend to spend on beauty for seasonal needs, affordable splurges and gifts for loved ones. They are focused on replenishing their essentials and strategically making smart purchases around strong value."Here's what the retailer reported for the fiscal third quarter compared with what Wall Street expected, according to LSEG:Ulta has benefitted from shoppers who have kept spending on beauty, even as they trim the budget or seek out lower-priced options in other discretionary categories. Yet the company faces stiffer competition from a wide range of rivals, including big-box retailers like Walmart, online players like Amazon and upstarts like TikTok Shop. Beauty sales have been strong overall this year in the U.S., according to data from market research firm Circana. In the first nine months of 2025, prestige beauty sales in terms of dollars rose 4% and mass beauty sales rose 5% year over year.According to Circana, beauty is poised to be a popular category during the holidays, with the market researcher's surveys indicating that more consumers plan to gift beauty products than a year ago, particularly those in households with higher-incomes and those with children.Revenue rose from $2.53 billion in the year-ago quarter.Comparable sales jumped by 6.3% year over year. Shoppers visited Ulta's stores and websites more and spent more during visits. Average ticket rose 3.8% and transactions increased by 2.4% year over year.In the three-month period that ended Nov. 1, Ulta reported net income of $230.9 million, or $5.14 per share, compared with $242.2 million, or $5.14 per share, in the year-ago quarter.Though consumer confidence is weak, Steelman said on Ulta's earnings call that "beauty engagement remained healthy." She said sales of both mass and prestige beauty items grew by mid single-digits year over year.Fragrance was its strongest category in the quarter, with double-digit sales growth year over year, as shoppers bought luxury scents from Valentino and Dolce & Gabbana and also lower-priced scents like Squishmallows perfumes.Steelman said that in October, Ulta added more shelf space for fragrance in more than 60% of its U.S. stores to try to get ready for higher demand during the holidays and beyond.In skincare, the retailer's second-fastest growing category, sales grew by high single digits year over year, she said. Shoppers bought items they discovered on social media, including Korean or K-beauty brands and purchased merchandise from Rihanna's Fenty Skin Body collection, which launched in the fall.To drive growth, Ulta has also been expanding internationally and launched a third-party marketplace in October. In July, it announced it had acquired Space NK, a British beauty retailer, from Manzanita Capital. The deal allows Ulta to enter a new international market, since Space NK has 83 stores in the United Kingdom and Ireland.During the third quarter, Ulta opened seven stores in Mexico through its joint venture partnership with Grupo Bakso. It opened its first Ulta store in the Middle East in Kuwait last month through a franchise partnership with Al-Shabaab.Through its marketplace, Ulta has added more than 120 brands and over 3,500 unique items to its online assortment, Steelman said. She said the company is "pleased with the initial performance and optimistic about how this new capability can help us strengthen our existing category, attract new guests, and capitalize on incremental growth opportunities in new subcategories," such as wellness. Higher tariffs have influenced some of the prices of items carried by Ulta, too. The company saw more brand-driven price increases in the third quarter than the second quarter, interim Chief Financial Officer Chris Lialios said. Sales in the haircare category grew by mid single-digits, despite a sales decline in personal styling tools that have felt pressure from tariff-related price increases, Steelman said.Ulta announced in October that Christopher DelOrefice, the chief financial officer of medical technology company Becton Dickinson & Company, will become its new CFO. He will start in the role on Dec. 5.As of Thursday's close, Ulta's shares have risen about 23% so far this year. That surpasses the S&P 500's nearly 17% gains during the same period.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 20:48

RFK Jr.'s vaccine panel defers vote on hepatitis B shot for babies until Friday

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuHealth and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s hand-picked vaccine committee on Thursday deferred crucial votes on hepatitis B vaccines for babies until Friday, saying it will give members more time to review proposed language on the measure. One panel member, Dr. Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, brought a motion to defer the votes following confusion amongst the group about the language. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends that every baby get vaccinated against hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth. It's unclear if the panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, could significantly delay or eliminate a so-called birth dose of the shot for babies whose mothers test negative for the virus. The group tabled a vote on the vaccine in September because some members called for a more robust discussion first.But any change could have wide-ranging consequences: Some public health experts say that having fewer newborns vaccinated against the virus could risk an increase in chronic infections among children. Hepatitis B, which can be passed from mother to baby during childbirth, can lead to liver disease and early death. There is no cure. "We have a vaccine that is highly effective at preventing an incurable disease. We should take full advantage of that," Neil Maniar, a public health professor at Northeastern University, told CNBC. The birth dose recommendation was introduced in 1991 and is credited with driving down infections in kids by 99% since then. Maniar called that a "remarkable success story that we run the risk of reversing" if the committee changes the recommendation. Decisions by the panel are not legally binding, as it is up to states to mandate immunizations. But ACIP's recommendations have significant implications for whether private insurance plans and government assistance programs cover the vaccines at no cost for eligible children. The panel's upcoming two-day meeting in Atlanta comes after Kennedy earlier this year gutted the committee and appointed 12 new members, including some well-known vaccine critics. During the meeting in September, some advisors raised questions about whether the benefits of the shot outweigh potential safety risks. But the jab is "an incredibly safe vaccine with minimal risks," Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases, said during a media briefing Tuesday. "I never once saw a fever actually associated with hepatitis B vaccine," said O'Leary, who practiced for eight years as a general pediatrician and worked in a newborn nursery. The AAP, which publishes its own vaccine schedule, still recommends the universal birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine because "it saves lives," he added. A new review, published Tuesday, of more than 400 studies spanning four decades also found no evidence that delaying the universal hepatitis B vaccine birth dose improves safety or effectiveness. The review also found that the birth dose does not cause any short- or long-term serious adverse events or deaths.A 2024 CDC study showed that the current vaccination schedule has helped prevent more than 6 million hepatitis B infections and nearly 1 million hepatitis B-related hospitalizations.Merck and GSK manufacture the hepatitis B vaccines used starting at birth. Neither of the shots are significant revenue drivers for the companies. But John Grabenstein, a former Merck vaccine executive and military pharmacist, said a change to the recommendation could cause vaccine supply disruptions for the companies. "They have build up their reserves, and they build up their thorough calculations so that they can meet the status quo," Grabenstein, who has no remaining financial ties to Merck, told CNBC. "If you disrupt the status quo without warning, then there would be too much of some things and not enough of other things that could easily create spot shortages." Still, he said his first concern from a public health standpoint is that fewer children will get vaccinated on time, leaving them vulnerable to infection. Merck during the panel's September meeting also pushed back on changing the recommendation. "The reconsideration of the newborn Hepatitis B vaccination on the established schedule poses a grave risk to the health of children and to the public, which could lead to a resurgence of preventable infectious diseases," Dr. Richard Haupt, Merck's head of global medical and scientific affairs for vaccines and infectious diseases, said at the time. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 20:38

Starbucks Workers United holds rally in NYC as strikes continue for a third week

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuNEW YORK — Starbucks Workers United held a rally outside the Empire State Building on Thursday as its open-ended strike entered its third week and no signs of an impending resolution.Adding to the crunch of holiday shoppers and tourists, several hundred picketers gathered outside of the famous landmark, which is also the site of a swanky three-floor Starbucks Reserve location and the company's regional headquarters. Members of other unions, like the AFL-CIO and Service Employees International Union, which is affiliated with Workers United, protested alongside baristas, chanting "No coffee, no contract" and "What's disgusting? Union busting" between speakers."Their fight is a fight really for all of us, to workers across the country, to corporations like Starbucks, across the country that workers are fed up with the status quo, and they're not going to take it anymore," SEIU President April Verrett told CNBC.Twelve demonstrators were arrested for blocking the building's entrance.Baristas launched the strike on Starbucks Red Cup Day last month, seeking new proposals from the company that address its top issues to finalize a contract. Those include improved hours, higher wages and the resolution of hundreds of unfair labor practice charges levied against Starbucks. Out of the 145 locations involved in the strike, 55 remain closed, according to a company spokesperson. The two parties have not been in active negotiations to reach a contract after talks between them fell apart late last year. The strikes have not changed that fact so far.While the strike has injected uncertainty into Starbucks' busy holiday season, the company has said its sales haven't been affected. CEO Brian Niccol told employees that Red Cup Day was its strongest in history. A successful holiday season will be key to the chain's turnaround under Niccol. Starbucks broke a nearly two-year streak of same-store sales declines in its most recently reported quarter. Past strikes have impacted less than 1% of its stores, the company said.The New York City rally comes after the company paid $38.9 million to settle violations of the city's Fair Workweek Law. Other large restaurant employers, like Chipotle, have previously run afoul of the law, which Starbucks said is "notoriously challenging" to navigate.The city's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection found Starbucks committed half a million violations of the law since 2021. The Fair Workweek law requires regular scheduling week to week, mandates schedules be provided 14 days in advance and says hours cannot be reduced by more than 15% without legitimate business reasons. DCWP Commissioner Vilda Vera Mayuga, who spoke at Thursday's rally, said the timing of the record-breaking settlement with the ongoing strike was coincidental."While the NYC laws remain unchanged and complex, our focus hasn't shifted – we're committed to creating the best job in retail and to ensuring our practices follow all laws," Starbucks said in a statement.The city's current Mayor Eric Adams and Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani have rallied behind striking workers. Mamdani joined Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., alongside baristas in Brooklyn earlier this week.Both Starbucks and the union have pointed blame at the other for failing to reach a bargaining agreement and maintain they are ready to speak when the other is. The two parties entered into mediation in February, and hundreds of barista delegates voted down the economic package Starbucks proposed in April. The company has said it is investing $500 million to improve the employee experience as part of its "Back to Starbucks" strategy. That investment includes upgrading its scheduling technology and adding more baristas to rosters. "As we've said, 99% of our 17,000 U.S. locations remain open and welcoming customers —including many the union publicly stated would strike but never closed or have since reopened. Regardless of the union's plans, we do not anticipate any meaningful disruption. When the union is ready to return to the bargaining table, we're ready to talk," spokesperson Jaci Anderson said in a statement.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 19:34

GM's new product chief Sterling Anderson eyes technology renaissance for automaker

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuDETROIT — General Motors' newest product and technology executive has said he thinks of the Detroit automaker as a canvas. One that can be curated, retouched or even torn apart. After roughly six months as executive vice president and chief product officer, Sterling Anderson appears to be putting all three ideas to work as he oversees the company's vast product portfolio — from the vehicles themselves to the software powering them.Anderson, who left the self-driving car company Aurora Innovation that he co-founded to join GM in June, has quickly become the most influential product executive in more than 15 years, outside of GM President Mark Reuss.He has consolidated power to oversee "the end-to-end product lifecycle" of GM vehicles, including manufacturing engineering, battery, software and services product management, and engineering teams, according to GM. "My priority is to accelerate the pace of innovation. One of the ways we do that is with this disaggregation of, or this abstraction of, software from hardware," he told CNBC during an Oct. 22 technology event in New York. "That's the point of the role, I think, is it brings together all of these pieces into a unified approach to how we do product going forward."Since then, the company's acclaimed heads of software and artificial intelligence have unexpectedly exited the company after relatively short tenures. Their main responsibilities related to vehicles now fall under Anderson.GM attributed the abrupt departures of Dave Richardson, senior vice president of software and services engineering, and Barak Turovsky, head of AI, to restructuring efforts."We are strategically integrating AI capabilities directly into our business and product organizations, enabling faster innovation and more targeted solutions," a GM spokeswoman said about Turovsky's departure in an emailed statement last week.It's another indication of Anderson's strategy. He previously told CNBC that for GM to succeed, software and product must be thought of as one and the same rather than as separate units, like they have been in recent years. Anderson said he spent the first months of his GM tenure "in a listen mode," immersing himself in the automaker's operations."What that five months of listening has allowed me to do is really fine tune and target how we're going, not just kind of what we're going to innovate on, but how we're going to do it," he said in the October interview.A third executive is also leaving soon, as Baris Cetinok, senior vice president of software and services product management, will depart the company effective Dec. 12, as first reported by CNBC.Unlike Richardson and Turovsky, the company did not attribute his departure to the restructuring. Three sources familiar with the situation who spoke anonymously because the discussion was private told CNBC that Cetinok left to pursue another opportunity.Cetinok, Richardson and Turovsky either declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment about their departures. Cetinok and Richardson joined GM in 2023, while Turovsky was hired in March.Anderson, a former McKinsey & Co. consultant turned Tesla executive, said before he joined GM, he had thought of the automaker more of a comedic caricature rather than a canvas that he would help turn into a modern masterpiece.Anderson said CEO Mary Barra and Reuss, whom he reports to, helped him break down that "old-world automotive" caricature and concerns about employees of the automaker not supporting his efforts."I was really worried about it, right? I'm the 'Silicon Valley cowboy' that's coming into Detroit and, you know, 'pew pewing' his way through an innovation story with a team that I was concerned wouldn't receive that well. I found it quite different from what I'd expected," Anderson said.His appointment is a refocus for the automaker on software-defined vehicles and autonomy. He said GM's goal is to build an autonomous vehicle, which comes a year after the company disbanded its majority-owned Cruise AV business following years of development and billions of dollars in capital. "Just be clear, we're developing a self-driving product," he told CNBC. "It's a self-driving product that can be safe without any handbacks to the human in safety critical situations."Barra on Wednesday cited Anderson and the automaker's past efforts in autonomous vehicles as reasons why GM is "well positioned" to achieve autonomous highway driving in its vehicles beginning in 2028."As we talk about artificial intelligence, autonomous driving is one of the ultimate applications that I still strongly believe in," Barra said at The New York Times DealBook Summit, reconfirming the automaker's "personal autonomous vehicle" plans rather than Cruise robotaxis. Anderson is considered a leading expert in vehicle autonomy. Before co-founding self-driving firm Aurora, he led Tesla's Model X program and the team that delivered its "Autopilot" advanced driver assistance system. He also developed the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's "Intelligent Co-Pilot," a semi-autonomous vehicle safety system.Anderson, who holds a master's and Ph.D. in robotics from MIT, said it took several conversations for him to leave Aurora, which he thought he "would die with."He isn't alone in his change of heart; however not many have lasted long at the automaker. Several other current and former Silicon Valley executives have voiced similar optimism about GM as well as its longstanding CEO and president — both of whom have spent their entire careers at the automaker as "GM lifers."Richardson previously hailed working for Barra, who he reported to before Anderson, as "an opportunity of a lifetime." Cetinok previously described his position as "a product person's dream" in an interview with CNBC.Jens Peter "JP" Clausen, who led Tesla's manufacturing expansion and worked at Lego and Google, partly credited the "opportunity to work for a leader like" Barra as a reason to join GM as its head of manufacturing before an unexpected departure after only one year.The accolades have gone both ways. When Anderson's appointment with GM was announced in May, Barra and Reuss hailed Anderson as being equipped to "evolve" and "reinvent" the automaker's operations.In addition to Anderson's new product unit, Reuss continues to oversee the automaker's manufacturing, design, marketing and sales, among other operations.The global automotive industry has battled for years to better integrate technology into vehicles — from their production to consumer-facing software and remote, or "over-the-air," updates like Tesla pioneered.GM has taken an aggressive approach to tech by hiring leaders from Tesla and companies such as Apple and Google. However, many times, those executives have had short tenures with the company, such as the three most recent departures."[Traditional U.S. automakers] have very much had a significant struggle with understanding software and electronics technology, and that has caused them to have a parade of experts quote 'coming in to help,'" said Peter Abowd, an engineer turned automotive and technology consultant.Abowd, general manager of engineering excellence at consulting firm Envorso, attributed the executive turnover to "a misapplication of skills and talent," as well as unrealistic expectations and overwhelming responsibilities in a company as large as GM and an industry as complex as the automotive world. "It's just kind of setting the person up for a bit of failure," Abowd said. "In a couple years, you can't culturally shift an organization ... so the best thing to do is to part ways."That kind of turnover has led automakers like GM to regularly pivot in different directions, including in-vehicle technologies, electric vehicle batteries and other areas not traditionally "core" to the automotive industry. Barra, who is GM's longest-serving CEO since the company's founder, has become known for hiring executives at opportunistic times based on the company's top priorities, which now appear to largely land under Anderson.GM "is really good at a lot on things" that aren't necessarily apparent to those outside the company, according to Anderson. He said he believes combining his experience with fast-moving companies such as Tesla and Aurora and GM's "massive machine" and resources will better position the automaker for the future."I view it as a canvas," Anderson said. "This is an extraordinary opportunity for innovation, and I'd be remiss not to see what I can do for it." Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 18:54

Tesla gains in 2026 Consumer Reports' auto brand rankings

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuDETROIT — U.S. electric vehicle sales leader Tesla made notable strides in Consumer Reports' influential annual auto brand rankings, cracking the top 10 overall for the U.S.The EV manufacturer jumped from No. 18 on last year's list of more than 30 automotive brands to 10th on the 2026 Consumer Reports Brand Report Card, which was released Thursday."They definitely have their struggles, but by continuing to refine and not make huge changes in their models, they're able to make more reliable vehicles, and they've moved up our rankings," Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing for Consumer Reports, told CNBC.The annual auto brand report card is based on Consumer Reports' testing as well as reliability, safety and overall customer satisfaction according to owner surveys.The surveys do not reflect broader consumer sentiment about the models or automakers ranked by CR outside of customer satisfaction. Tesla has faced a consumer backlash against CEO Elon Musk in response to his work with the Trump administration and endorsements of far-right politicians and personalities around the world, including Germany's extreme anti-immigrant party AfD. Fisher said Tesla's gain occurred as its vehicles have become more reliable over time, especially as the company hasn't made significant design changes to many of its vehicles like traditional automakers tend to do. Tesla instead relies on remote, or over-the-air, updates to revise many features on the vehicles. Its powertrain reliability remains a standout among EVs, according to Consumer Reports.The only Tesla model to have a below-average score is the Cybertruck, its newest model that features a host of new technologies such as a 48-volt architecture system and "steer by wire." "They're definitely improving by keeping with things and refining, but if you look at their 5- to 10-year-old models that are out there, when it comes to reliability, they're dead last of all the brands," Fisher said. "They're able to improve the reliability if they don't make major changes."On the other end of report card, Rivian Automotive moved up five spots to No. 26 but remains near the bottom of the rankings. Fisher said Rivian models are the lowest in reliability.Despite Rivian's reliability issues, the brand has the highest owner satisfaction, according to Consumer Reports. Fisher during an Automotive Press Association webinar Thursday said its owners are largely early adopters that are willing to deal with some growing pains likely more than more mainstream consumers would. Brands with good reliability tend to perform well in the overall rankings. Reliability for new 2026 models is predicted based on each model's overall reliability for the past three years, provided that the model hasn't been redesigned during that time.Subaru topped the overall 2026 brand list, followed by BMW, Porsche, Honda and Toyota to round out the top five brands. At the bottom of the rankings were Jeep, Land Rover, GMC, Dodge and Alfa Romeo.Ford Motor's Lincoln, the highest-ranked domestic brand, made the biggest jump in this year's rankings, climbing 17 positions to No. 7 due to its reliability scores. Audi dropped the most from last year, falling back 10 spots to No. 16.Traditional U.S. automakers, specifically Stellantis brands, struggled compared with their Asian competition in Consumer Reports' annual brand reliability rankings.Of note, the Ford brand ranked No. 18 in the report card but saw improvement in reliability. The automaker, which has struggled with quality issues and recalls, had its Ford brand rank No. 11 in reliability — its best position in 15 years.GM's top-ranked brand was Cadillac at No. 17, followed by Buick at No. 20, Chevrolet at No. 24 and GMC at 29th.Consumer Reports said hybrid vehicles, which are growing in popularity, continue to stand out over other "electrified" vehicles, as well as traditional vehicles with internal combustion engines.Of approximately 30 hybrids analyzed by Consumer Reports, only the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, Lincoln Nautilus Hybrid and Mazda CX-50 Hybrid have below-average predicted reliability scores.— CNBC's Lora Kolodny contributed to this article.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 16:43

Where billionaires' investment firms placed their bets in November

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuRising stocks and IPOs helped create 287 new billionaires this yearRobert FrankWhat the retail boom in alternative assets means for risk, liquidity and portfolio allocationLeslie PickerAsset-backed finance is growing fast and drawing new scrutinyRobert FrankRead MoreSubscribe to CNBC PROSubscribe to Investing ClubLicensing & ReprintsCNBC CouncilsJoin the CNBC PanelDigital ProductsNews ReleasesClosed CaptioningCorrectionsAbout CNBCInternshipsSite MapCareersHelpContactNews TipsGot a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 15:56

Bids for WBD are in. Here's what Paramount, Comcast and Netflix could do with the assets

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuWith more than a century of some of the most popular film and television content, it's no wonder why Paramount Skydance, Comcast and Netflix are bidding for Warner Bros. Discovery's assets.Paramount made an initial offer in September to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, leading WBD, which months earlier had announced plans to split itself into two companies, to officially explore a sale process.WBD's plans mirrored those of Comcast — separating out its cable networks from its movie properties and streaming service, HBO Max. Its coveted library of content includes franchises like DC's superheroes, Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, Looney Tunes and Scooby-Doo. It is also the distributor of Legendary's Dune franchise and Godzilla and King Kong films. The cable networks include CNN, TNT, TBS and TruTV, among others.Earlier this week the company received second-round bids from potential buyers, according to people familiar with the matter who declined to be named speaking about internal processes. As of Thursday morning, Netflix was the leading bidder based on how WBD is valuing the offers, CNBC reported Thursday. WBD expects to announce a winner as early as next week, sources told CNBC. "All three candidates could potentially be beneficial, which is why Warner Bros. would be such an attractive acquisition," said Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango and founder of Box Office Theory. "Potential isn't enough, though. Resources, experience, and the proven ability to execute must be weighed."Here's what each suitor could do with WBD assets. Comcast is in the process of spinning out its portfolio of cable networks, which includes CNBC, but will retain broadcast network NBC, streaming service Peacock, the Universal film studio and theme parks. Given its exit from the cable TV business, Comcast isn't interested in Warner Bros. Discovery's massive portfolio of networks. Therefore, Comcast's offer includes a clause that would allow WBD to spin out its cable networks at any point before the proposed acquisition closes, CNBC previously reported. Warner Bros. Discovery intellectual property would serve the most immediate boost to NBCUniversal's Peacock. The streaming service is far behind its peers in terms of subscriber numbers, with just 41 million customers as of Sept. 30. The platform has bulked up heavily on sports programming but has been lacking on original content.Outside of the superhero fare, WBD's television content could strengthen NBCUniversal's streaming service Peacock with programming like "IT: Welcome to Derry," "The Pitt," "The Last of Us" and a pair of shows from the Game of Thrones universe. Adding Warner Bros. Discovery's IP into the fold would allow Universal to bolster its number of popular franchises, pad its streaming service with television content and expand its theme park business."For Comcast, it would simply add to the depth of Universal's current roster which already mixes a healthy balance of IP and more daring, often original, content," Robbins said. "They check a lot of necessary boxes, without question."Universal already has a vast collection of franchise IP including Jurassic Park, Fast & Furious and Despicable Me as well as a suite of popular horror films."Comcast — they've got a pretty good film slate," said Doug Creutz, senior media and entertainment analyst at TD Cowen. "They're trying to sort of create Disney Prime piece by piece, and I guess having a superhero brand would be another step in that direction. I don't know that it's something that they particularly view as a strategic imperative. I think having more IP generally is something that, of course, you always would like."Warner Bros. Discovery's DC Studios, now under the stewardship of James Gunn and Peter Safran, are set for a slew of theatrical releases as well as upcoming TV series. The pair's first film, "Superman," which released in July, tallied more than $600 million at the global box office and received positive reviews from critics. On the slate is a Supergirl film, a Superman sequel, a second Batman film from Matt Reeves and a Clayface feature. On the television front, DC has plans for shows centered on the Green Lantern Corps; the origins of Wonder Woman's island of Amazons; and some lesser known, but fan favorite comic book characters like Booster Gold.Comcast and Warner Bros. Discovery already have some IP in common. The NBCUniversal parent licenses the rights to the Wizarding World for its theme parks. Having the film and television rights to Harry Potter would allow the company more control over production and how that translates into rides, experiences and merchandise."There are synergistic opportunities that you could turn over if you had authority over film and TV production, along with having the theme parks," Creutz said.Disney is the blueprint for this strategy. The company's portfolio of intellectual property has been the bedrock of its theme parks since the first location opened its doors in 1955. Disney controls not only the production of content, but also how it's curated in its themed experiences.The most surprising bidder of the bunch, Netflix, has similarly been looking only at WBD's streaming and studio assets.After all, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos reiterated during the company's third-quarter earnings in October that the company has "no interest in owning legacy media networks."Initially, analysts and industry insiders speculated that Netflix's interest in Warner Bros. Discovery was simply an effort to hike the price for its competitors who were eager to acquire WBD assets. But the streaming giant has made a bid of mostly cash, sources told CNBC, and remains a competitive bidder. And the streaming giant could earnestly benefit from WBD's content library.As a relatively new player in the space — Netflix didn't release original content until 2012 — it took the company time to build out its franchises. Because of that, Netflix didn't even launch a merchandising division until 2019 and didn't have an official online store until 2021.Now, it has a handful of strong intellectual properties like "Stranger Things," "KPop Demon Hunters," "Bridgerton," "Wednesday" and "Squid Games." Like Comcast, having access to beloved franchises that have built-in audiences would be a big boon for Netflix.Yet, industry experts are more interested in how the company would handle WBD assets that have traditionally been released in theaters."With Netflix, it's less a question of how it could benefit them and more a deep concern of how they would handle the Warner Bros. legacy, particularly from a theatrical perspective," said Robbins. "The money would certainly be there, yes, as would the initial exposure. But would their willingness be to behave more like a traditional movie studio than they have shown so far?"Netflix has long opposed releasing films in theaters and only does so to stay in awards contention, to appease high-profile directors or to capitalize on buzzy titles. The streamer has always argued that its content is meant to be delivered to its subscribers through the Netflix platform and has limited how long its theatrical releases run in cinemas.This strategy has allowed Netflix to avoid costly marketing campaigns, which are typically estimated to be about half of whatever is spent on the production budget. However, it also often puts the company at odds with theatrical partners. The company also does not share box-office data, something traditional movie studios provide."Many in the industry feel a Netflix purchase of Warner would be a death knell for some of the movie business's most important aspects, properties, and long-held traditions," Robbins said. "Netflix would need a significant turnabout face to even begin easing that sentiment."Netflix has told Warner Bros. Discovery management that it would honor contractual agreements to release movies in theaters if it secures a deal to acquire its assets, people familiar with the matter told CNBC. Things are moving fast over at Paramount.The company was recently merged with Skydance, and, in short order, its new CEO and chairman, David Ellison, has signed creative and C-suite talent, greenlit new franchises and struck a $7.7 billion deal for live UFC rights.This strategy was laid out in an open letter from Ellison published in early August, in which he told investors that Paramount would invest in "high-quality storytelling and cutting-edge technology" to help "define the next era of entertainment."Ellison is hoping that the next era will include the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery — in its entirety."Paramount has struggled in recent years to capture the same kind of consistent, top-tier franchise output as some of their rivals," Robbins said. "There's a strong argument that absorbing Warner Bros.' library would move the needle in a more material way pound for pound."Paramount has a suite of franchises like Star Trek, Transformers, Sonic the Hedgehog, Paw Patrol and SpongeBob SquarePants, but much of its theatrical success has been tied to one actor, in particular."Paramount's by-far-most-important IP is a 63-year-old dude who does his own stunts," Creutz said. "Maybe they are going to make an AI version of Tom Cruise and we'll keep getting Tom Cruise movies for the next 100 years. But, the next thing down the ladder for them — it's Star Trek." Before the Paramount-Skydance merger, the studio released around eight films annually, Ellison told investors in the company's third-quarter earnings report in November. The new goal is to release at least 15 films theatrically in 2026.So far, the slate for next year has about 10 titles, some produced solely by Paramount and some as part of the studio's distribution deals. Most studios update their calendar throughout the year, especially as new independent features come up for sale during film festivals. Acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery and its theatrical slate would easily get Paramount past its goal. However, Creutz noted that typically when studios merge, the number of films tends to decline in the years that follow. "If Warner merges with any of these other companies, you are going to see some similar dynamic on the film side, you're going to see a similar dynamic on the TV production side, and you're probably going to see a similar dynamic in whatever they do with the streaming platform," he said. "Presumably, in all three cases, there's a merger of streaming platforms and that's going to probably result in less content for consumers."Where Paramount diverges from the competing bids is that it wants all of WBD, including its cable networks. Of note, CNN would bolster Paramount's news coverage, which already includes CBS, and the addition of TNT, TBS and TruTV would represent a big addition to the company's sports coverage.Live sports rights are scarce and only become available when previous deals expire. Apple has already emerged as the future home of Formula 1, and Major League Baseball is waiting until its deals expire after the 2028 season to reorganize its media packages. That means that Paramount will have few other top-shelf sports assets to bid on and acquire in the medium term.Meanwhile, Warner Bros. Discovery has the rights to broadcast games from the National Hockey League, Major League Baseball and NCAA March Madness basketball along with the French Open and NASCAR.Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.— CNBC's Julia Boorstin, Lillian Rizzo and Alex Sherman contributed to this report. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 13:00

Fanatics lands retail and merchandising deal for 2026 FIFA World Cup

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuSign up today for the new CNBC Sport NewsletterFanatics has struck a deal to run retail and merchandising for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the company announced Thursday. The global competition will see 104 matches played in 16 stadiums across the U.S., Canada and Mexico this coming summer. "There is no larger sporting event in the entire world than the World Cup … we've been doing a lot of events; this is the biggest one we'll have done yet," said Andrew Low Ah Kee, CEO of Fanatics Commerce, the company's manufacturing and retail arm. Over the last several years, Fanatics has overseen retail operations at international sporting events like MLB's Tokyo Series, the NFL's slate of international games, the NHL's Four Nations tournament and UEFA's Euro 2024 in Germany. Fanatics was also the retail partner of FIFA's Club World Cup tournament across the U.S. last summer.As part of its deal with FIFA for the 2026 tournament, Fanatics will oversee the in-venue retail operations across all 16 locations, which are mostly NFL stadiums with seating capacity of more than 60,000 fans. It will also have retail operations in the parking lot at each stadium, as well as a retail presence at each of FIFA's fan festival locations spread across the host cities. In total, Fanatics is forecasting it will have more than 2,000 point-of-sale locations during the tournament."In terms of the logistical complexity of it, it's very real, but I'm confident in our readiness," said Low Ah Kee, adding that Fanatics has already operated in all the venues where the tournament will be held.While the length of the tournament – 39 days, to accommodate a larger field of 48 nations – could present another layer of complexity compared to one-off events or shorter tournaments, Low Ah Kee said the company is aiming to lean into the momentum that is built during a World Cup, capitalizing on matchups and moments that arise to create quick-strike products and other limited merchandise.Fanatics has expanded its soccer-focused retail operations in recent years, and is a partner of MLS, a quarter of the Premier League clubs, and several of the biggest club teams across the world like PSG, Inter Milan and Juventus. It's also a partner to several national teams who will be competing, such as Argentina, England, France, Belgium and Germany.Low Ah Kee said that Fanatics' existing relationships have helped the company better understand soccer fans. That means more fashion-forward products and, specifically, more scarves, Low Ah Kee said.Fanatics is already in discussion with partners, manufacturers, brands and vendors to make sure that the product stays well stocked for what it expects to be an unprecedented sports retail moment."We think this could be a multiple of the biggest events that we've run historically," Low Ah Kee said, declining to share specific figures.Fanatics' execution of the 2026 World Cup will also set the stage for another massive undertaking: The company will oversee retail operations for the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics.Disclosure: CNBC parent NBCUniversal owns NBC Sports and NBC Olympics. NBC Olympics is the U.S. broadcast rights holder to all Summer and Winter Games through 2036. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant.CNBC Sport: U.S. men’s soccer is sick of losing the World Cup — and now it has a planAlex ShermanFanatics launches prediction market in 24 statesLaya NeelakandanMillennials are driving a sports tourism boom — and spending big to do it. Here's whyKaela LingRead MoreSubscribe to CNBC PROSubscribe to Investing ClubLicensing & ReprintsCNBC CouncilsJoin the CNBC PanelDigital ProductsNews ReleasesClosed CaptioningCorrectionsAbout CNBCInternshipsSite MapCareersHelpContactNews TipsGot a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 4, 02:22

Trump's South Korea tariff cuts are major boost for Hyundai and GM

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuDETROIT — Hyundai Motor and General Motors are set to be two of the greatest beneficiaries of lower U.S. tariffs on imports, including vehicles, from South Korea.The South Korean-based automaker is the largest U.S. importer of new vehicles from the country, followed by GM. Both automakers have paid billions of dollars in levies so far this year after President Donald Trump placed 25% tariffs on imported vehicles from South Korea and other countries in the spring. The Trump administration this past week confirmed plans to lower tariffs on certain products, including vehicles, to 15% from South Korea. A notice about the implementation of the trade deal was posted Wednesday on the Federal Register. Other countries such as Japan and the United Kingdom also have negotiated lower tariff rates with the Trump administration.Prior to the reduction, Hyundai reported U.S. tariffs costed the company 1.8 trillion won ($1.2 billion) in the third quarter, up from 828 billion won ($565 million) in the previous quarter. GM most recently said its tariff impacts, largely from South Korea and Mexico, were expected to be between $3.5 billion and $4.5 billion in 2025.GM CFO Paul Jacobson said Wednesday that the automaker initially expected tariffs on South Korean imports to cost $2 billion but that the company has been able to offset many of those costs. He said GM expects the levies to cost closer to $1 billion or less in 2026."We do think that is going to be a tailwind next year, just not as much as the whole 50% because the ultimate tariff bill that we're going to pay this year for Korea was going to be a lot lower than the $2 billion from the stuff that we've been working on," Jacobson said during a UBS conference.The U.S. tariff announcement comes after South Korea officially introduced legislation in its parliament aiming to fulfill its promise to invest $350 billion for the U.S. over several years."Korea's commitment to American investment strengthens our economic partnership and domestic jobs and industry. We are also grateful for the deep trust between our two nations," U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a statement posted Monday on X.Hyundai North America CEO Randy Parker said the tariffs are still challenging but better than 25% as the automaker aims for a sixth-consecutive year of record U.S. retail sales in 2026. "Fifteen percent is still 15%," he told CNBC during a phone interview Tuesday. "Getting to 15% is a great milestone. It's been quite the journey reaching this agreement, which has been, I would say, quite extensive."Hyundai, including its Kia subsidiary that operates separately in the U.S., has significantly increased its sales and operations in the U.S. in recent years. But the automaker continues to import the majority of its vehicles — estimated to be nearly 1 million units this year — from South Korea.GlobalData estimates more than 1.37 million vehicles, or about 8.6% of the U.S. sales this year, will be vehicles that were imported from South Korea — making the country the largest exporter of American-sold vehicles aside from Mexico.Hyundai is expected to import more than 951,000 vehicles in 2025, according to GlobalData. That includes more than 369,000 for Kia and 582,000 for Hyundai and its luxury Genesis brand.Hyundai aims to have more than 80% of its U.S. vehicle sales be produced locally by 2030, the company said this year. That compares with roughly 40% currently. Despite the tariffs, GM is estimated to import nearly 422,000 vehicles from South Korea this year to the U.S., according to GlobalData. That would be a 3.6% increase compared with record imports of more than 407,000 units last year.GM has increasingly used South Korean plants to produce popular entry-level crossovers for Chevrolet and Buick. Its U.S. sales of South Korean-produced vehicles — largely entry-level models — have risen from 173,000 in 2019 to more than 407,000 last year, according to GlobalData.GM, in an emailed statement, said the company "appreciates that negotiators have finalized an agreement on trade between the US and South Korea.""GM's long-standing Korea operations produce high-quality, affordable crossovers that complement our U.S. vehicles and domestic production, which will soon rise to 2 million units. We will be monitoring and reviewing the details," GM said.GM produces its Buick Encore GX and Buick Envista crossovers, as well as the Chevrolet Trailblazer and Chevrolet Trax crossovers, at plants in South Korea. The company has touted the vehicles as being a pinnacle for the automaker's profitable growth in lower-margin, entry-level vehicles.The new U.S.-South Korea trade deal comes months after a period of tension between the two countries following an immigration raid at a battery plant jointly owned by Hyundai and LG Energy Solution in Georgia.About 475 workers, including more than 300 South Koreans, were arrested in the Sept. 4 raid at the plant in Ellabell, Georgia, according to U.S. immigration officials. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 3, 17:50

Delta says government shutdown cost it $200 million, but forecasts strong travel demand into 2026

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuDelta Air Lines said the government shutdown that ended last month cost it approximately $200 million in pretax profit as bookings softened during the longest such impasse in U.S. history.The airline said the earnings impact would be approximately 25 cents a share for the current quarter. In October, Delta forecast adjusted fourth-quarter earnings of $1.60 to $1.90 a share.Travel demand, however, is still healthy, and bookings are strong going into 2026, Delta reiterated in a securities filing on Wednesday ahead of an industry conference.Air traffic controller shortages worsened during the shutdown, and the Trump administration forced airlines to trim their schedules to relieve pressure on controllers. But even with that move, delays and cancellations ended up being higher than expected in the days before the shutdown ended. Air traffic controllers, already stretched thin before the shutdown, were required to work without their regular paychecks during that period.Delta CEO Ed Bastian and other airline executives have repeatedly pressed lawmakers and officials in Washington to ensure that air traffic controllers, Transportation Security Administration officers and other workers tied to air travel are paid in the event of another shutdown.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →
CNBC Business Dec 3, 16:44

Beyonce, Sydney Sweeney and a fight for relevance: How American Eagle, Gap and Levi sparked a new 'denim war'

LivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPoliticsVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenuLevi Strauss CEO Michelle Gass was out for a run in San Francisco last March when she first heard the song "Levii's Jeans" from Beyonce's latest album, "Cowboy Carter." "Literally, I got chills," Gass recounted to CNBC, adding the name-check represented a "once in a lifetime" marketing opportunity she couldn't afford to squander. "She is one of the most celebrated and influential artists of our time. ... We asked the question, 'Could there be something more?'" Six months later, Levi announced Beyonce would star in a new global marketing campaign. Then, a pattern that's repeated itself since Levi invented blue jeans more than 150 years ago happened again: competitors raced to catch up.Gap and American Eagle launched their own star-studded campaigns the following summer in a bid to sell more jeans. Gap partnered with girl group Katseye in its viral made-for-TikTok "Milkshake" ad, while American Eagle chose actress Sydney Sweeney for its controversial "good jeans" campaign. Just before Thanksgiving, American Eagle launched another celebrity campaign with a different type of star: Martha Stewart. Some smaller brands that can't pay for a name like Beyonce have gotten free marketing just from celebrities wearing their denim. In late August, Kylie Jenner posted a picture of herself in True Religion jeans, leading to a spike in sales, CEO Michael Buckley told CNBC. He called it the "ultimate compliment." Industrywide, brands aired nearly 70% more denim TV spots this year compared with last, as the global jeans market swelled to $101 billion, up 28% since 2020, according to data from TV outcomes company EDO and market research company Euromonitor International. Behind the big campaigns were hints about each retailer's strategies and challenges. American Eagle is trying to win over more men. Levi's wants to court more women. Gap is working to find relevance among a new generation of shoppers. But taken together, the marketing shows the lengths companies are going to dominate a growing denim category that is still up for grabs — even if Levi may have created it. In an economy where many shoppers are thinking twice before shelling out for a new pair of jeans, retailers are scrapping harder than ever to win every dollar they can. "There definitely is a denim war. There's a war for people's attention. There's a war for people's spend," said Neil Saunders, retail analyst and GlobalData managing director. "Who has the most comfortable denim? Who has the softest feel? Who has the best cuts? What fits me well? There's much more consideration in the customer buying process than for some other products, so it does make it much more of a battle between the retailers." Like all things in fashion, denim goes through cycles. It's a stalwart garment in any closet, but sometimes it's in fashion, and sometimes it's not. The last time denim was this big was during the 2000s when brands like True Religion and Joe's Jeans were a favorite among A-listers before athleisure became more popular and transformed casual dressing. "When we came out of Covid, I think to me this is really when it started, when we started to see consumers basically say, 'Look, I want to feel like I am not sitting in my house anymore, I want to feel like I am getting dressed up to go out,'" said Janine Stichter, a retail analyst and managing director at financial services firm BTIG. "That kind of started to bring about the denim cycle that we're in right now." In past denim booms, certain cuts dominated, like skinny jeans in the 2000s and bell bottoms and flares in the 1970s. This time around, any cut goes, and consumers are moving beyond jeans to a wider variety of denim garments, creating a bigger market opportunity. "Now we're seeing everything from wide leg to barrel leg to bootcut. It all kind of has a place," said Stichter. "That's a reason why companies might want to invest behind it, because there's just so many styles that consumers are accepting right now." Denim has been a bright spot for retailers in a sluggish apparel market, but they've had to fight harder for consumer attention as more rivals invest in the space. Younger shoppers are prioritizing value over brand loyalty, cash-strapped consumers are pulling back on new clothes and the category has grown increasingly competitive, analysts said. Major apparel players like Levi, Gap and American Eagle aren't just competing with one another. They're also vying against emerging brands, fast-fashion retailers and thrift stores, where many Gen Z consumers might opt for a vintage pair of jeans instead of buying new. To cut through all of the noise, companies needed to go big with their marketing campaigns, said Saunders. "The whole world and his wife are on denim at the moment. Everyone's pushing and talking about it, so they just needed to do something that was a little bit more edgy," Saunders said. "They didn't want to play it safe, because that's not really going to make noise in the market."For Gap and American Eagle, both legacy mall players with fading relevance, the denim play goes deeper than just driving revenue. In a way, they're reintroducing themselves to a new generation of customers as they work to reclaim their standing in fashion and culture. "Leaning into denim and having these big campaigns around denim is part of a wider push to reinvigorate the brands, and I think that's why they've gone all out on it, because they see denim almost as a halo that can shine light on the rest of the brand and the things that they're doing," said Saunders. "It's the relevance play because … American Eagle had become a little bit stale and was struggling with the results, Gap is in the midst of a reinvention to really try to make the brand much more relevant, especially to younger consumers." In an interview with CNBC, Gap CEO Richard Dickson said the Katseye campaign allowed the company to reach a wide set of consumers in a strategic way. "It has absolutely resonated with Gen Z, who is still in the discovery phase of the Gap brand," he said. "But what it also did is, it reinforced loyalty with our core consumer. So again, we're bridging the generation gap by appealing to multiple audiences."While the market has been flooded with denim advertisements, the content of the ads is having a big impact on engagement, EDO said. The effectiveness of jeans ads, measured by consumer engagement like searches and site visits, improved 9% year over year from January through August, suggesting the creative messaging behind the spots matters more than frequency, EDO said. Levi's denim ads were 304% more effective than the average clothing ad, even after it cut back on airings by nearly a third, said EDO. Retailers don't disclose how much they spend on individual advertising campaigns, but those investments are part of a company's selling, general and administrative costs, which they disclose in filings. In Levi's fiscal year ended Dec. 1, 2024, which covers the debut of its Beyonce campaign, the company's SG&A expenses were nearly $200 million higher than the previous year, more than half of which was spent in the quarter the campaign debuted. The company previously acknowledged the Beyonce ads contributed to the higher costs, and Gass told CNBC it was a bet worth taking."The Beyonce campaign had a great return for us," said Gass. "When we look at our business results, our sales are growing, but our profits are growing as well overall, so we feel good about the investment."Since Gass took over, winning over more female shoppers has been at the core of her strategy, and the company's Beyonce campaign is helping it achieve that goal. Last October, days after the campaign launched, Levi said its women's business represented about 35% of overall revenue. A year later, it's about 38%. "It's driving a lot of our growth. That should be half of our business," said Gass. "Based on the momentum we're seeing, there's no reason why we can't achieve that." True Religion, which is privately held and doesn't disclose its financials, told CNBC denim sales rose 38% between Aug. 20 and Aug. 22, the time period in which social media influencer Alix Earle and Jenner made organic posts about the company's jeans. "When Kylie posted, not only did she put us in a story, but she put us in a carousel as a hard post on her wall. She probably charges $500,000 to a million dollars for that," said Kristen D'Arcy, True Religions' chief marketing officer and head of digital growth. "The results of those posts, especially on women's denim sales, was pretty incredible."Since American Eagle's and Gap's campaigns are newer, it's too early to say how they have affected long-term sales. But they've already made their mark in culture and on Wall Street. When American Eagle announced its campaign with Sweeney, the company became a meme stock sensation, only to see those gains erased after it faced criticism over the ad's tone and messaging. Later, President Donald Trump weighed in and called it the "hottest ad out there," leading the stock to soar once again. "It was billions of impressions. I mean, it was amazing what happened. It struck a new conversation," Jennifer Foyle, president and executive creative director for AE & Aerie, told CNBC in an interview. "When we launched that campaign, we knew it was going to be exciting but it really took off." Some news reports suggested foot traffic at the company's stores fell in the aftermath of the ad. However, the company later said traffic across channels had been "consistently positive throughout August," the month after the campaign launched. Following the Sweeney ad and another campaign with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, the company said in early September it had seen "meaningful improvement in the business," with growth in comparable sales and the acquisition of 700,000 new customers. "It definitely helped our traffic. We definitely gained new customers," said Foyle. "Keep in mind, those new customers don't always come right back and shop, right? So, definitely there'll be a halo effect for sure as we head into Q4 and future seasons." Following the controversy over the campaign, American Eagle apparently removed one of the ads from most of its social pages – the one where Sweeney discusses genes being passed down from parent to offspring that incited the most blowback and comparisons to eugenics. The spot is now only visible on American Eagle's Facebook page. A company spokesperson denied the retailer took the ad down, saying "once content is released, it's out for the world to see." American Eagle declined further comment on the Sweeney controversy. About a week after the ads came out, it posted a statement on its Instagram page saying the campaign "is and always was about the jeans."When American Eagle issued fiscal third-quarter results on Tuesday, it was the first time investors got to see a full quarter of impact from the Sweeney and Kelce campaigns. While the company said that the campaigns are "attracting more customers" and creating more attention around the brand, the results showed they're not yet a major revenue driver.At American Eagle's namesake banner, where the campaigns were focused, comparable sales grew just 1% in the three months ended Nov. 1, worse than the 2.1% analysts had expected, according to StreetAccount. Meanwhile, SG&A expenses were up by about $35 million year over year, due in large part to its campaigns with Sweeney and Kelce. The increase in costs didn't have a major impact on American Eagle's operating margin, which came in higher than expected.Last month, Gap said comparable sales at its namesake banner surged 7% in the quarter after the Katseye ad came out -- more than double what analysts had expected, according to StreetAccount. "The brand saw growth in [average unit retail], consideration, organic impressions, new customers, so generating significant traffic," Dickson told CNBC. "Double-digit growth in denim, 8 billion impressions, so we're very pleased and excited about the long-term proposition and the continued progress the brand is making."Meanwhile, the campaign has been a viral sensation, racking up 50 million views on YouTube alone in the last three months. That's five times the 10 million views American Eagle's Sweeney ad saw on the platform in four months. Still, both of the ads combined don't come close to the engagement Levi's Beyonce campaign has seen on YouTube. The four "chapters" of the campaign, which were released between last September and August, have garnered a staggering 85 million views combined. "Levi's is definitely winning the war overall. I mean, this is Levi's home turf, you're playing in the home stadium, so they have an inbuilt advantage," said Saunders. "They have been very savvy about creating the culture around denim. They've got arguably the biggest celebrity on their team, and they've widened the lifestyle aesthetic, so they've really led this." Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by
Read full story →